By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 360S beats PS3 Slim in heat test multiple times

The Xbox 360 Slim Beats PS3 Slim in Heat Tests Multiple Times

 

After doing a test to compare both the PS3 and new Xbox 360 S model two weeks ago, we got a lot of feedback that was both positive and negative. More than a few emails and comments criticized our choice to use a 160 GB PS3 (fat) model in our tests instead of using the newer slim model. In order to ensure the test did offer consistent and precise results, we decided to have both Craig Hasselback and myself (The Brandon Arthur Thompson Esquire) handle five separate tests over a week’s time. The goal was to determine whether or not the results were in fact flawed and also to see if a different outcome would come about using the newer PS3 slim.

Due to an inability to acquire five Xbox 360 S models and five PS3 slims; we ran the test using four identical Xbox 360 S consoles and one Xbox 360 Premium (old) model. The consoles were partnered with four PS3 slims and the original 160gb PS3 fat. This allowed for a fat versus fat and multiple slim versus slim. For the games, we had to do it out of pocket, so we grabbed six copies of Madden 09 and ran three pairings and then one pair of slims and the fats. The tests conducted consisted of game simulations running until one system or another overheated (or shutdown in each test).

The slims took the longest despite being in closed cabinets. We had to conduct the comparison in closed cabinets to simulate entertainment centers because all six consoles ran fine through the first two work days with not a single console freezing, shutting down, or malfunctioning.

After putting the consoles in barely ventilated cabinets, the tests finally “heated up”. In every slim model tests, the PS3 models shutdown first. This occurred multiple times as we tested each pairing three times. This doesn’t mean the PS3 models are faulty by any means. It simple means they’re designed to shutdown at a lower temp or possibly they heat up faster. Even after multiple tests in identical situations with high temp exposure, not a single console showed any sign of damage after rebooting. The “fat” models however were a much easier test in terms of time and results. The PS3 160gb won this test in under five hours. Sadly the 360 Premium (fat model) was under able to reboot as we got red ring and boxed that one up.

The fat model results are not a real big surprise. We’ve known the issues the original Xbox 360 SKUs have had since 2005. The new models however continue to surprise with improved reliability and the ability to handle heat much better than their predecessor.



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

Around the Network

Nice!

I did lol a bit when the ps3 phat was able to reboot...and the 360 was rrod.

 

Glad to see me replacing my jasper for a new 360s is good sound of mind for me.



wait,

if I got it, you are using same game (Madden) on both console despite this game not "really" being the same because they are not neither optimized, neither done, neither programmed the same way.

In clear : you dont know if this game "Madden 09" is asking the same amount of work by the PS3 and the Xbox360 meaning you dont know if they are making a similar effort to make this game run.

This test could be improved by using 2 others multiplateform games as comparaison.

Neverthless, good improvement for the 360



Time to Work !

laugh out loud at that

1st theres no data

2nd 360S STILL uses external power supply doubt they had the power supply in the cabinet when testing the 360S

3rd unknown if they are using current cech 2100 PS3s 

4th like iam going to believe a site called gofanboy

5th its confirmed that ps3 uses less watts than the 360S even some of the older fats less power means less heat ps3 is probably running hotter than the 360S b/c of its internals being so compact including the power supply in the console not b/c of poor tech design



                                                             

                                                                      Play Me

BHR-3 said:

laugh out loud at that

1st theres no data

2nd 360S STILL uses external power supply doubt they had the power supply in the cabinet when testing the 360S

3rd unknown if they are using current cech 2100 PS3s 

4th like iam going to believe a site called gofanboy

5th its confirmed that ps3 uses less watts than the 360S even some of the older fats less power means less heat ps3 is probably running hotter than the 360S b/c of its internals being so compact including the power supply in the console not b/c of poor tech design


Only thing I wanted to address. Many times in the past, I argued using the site PS3fanboy.com as a source sometimes. People would then discredit me by saying "yea...you're using a site called PS3 fanboy, why should we listen to you?"

But we all know PS3Fanboy is just a PS3-only news branch of Joystiq, which everyone accepts as credible. While Joystiq posts all gaming news, PS3Fanboy only posted to PS3 news. That doesn't show any bias against other consoles

What I'm trying to say is, just because a site has "fanboy" in the name doesn't necessarily take away it's credibility. In fact, Go Fanboy equally covers all the consoles. Just go to their news archive



Around the Network
kowenicki said:

good to know... nice reliable hardware all round now, both Sony and MS.

Well, except for the Phat 360, but that's a given.

@ BHR-3

You do bring up a good point about the power supplies.  It would be nice to know if they kept the power supplies inside the cabinet, too.  But like you, I doubt they did.  Maybe if they get enough feedback, they will again change their experiment.  Would like to know the results of that test.



The AC adapter and the Slim model arguments are valid, rest are all just ranting from BHR-3.



this article is written by a compulsive liar.



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

anybody remember that test a while back on ps3 temperature experimentation?

Here it is:

"In three rounds of testing, separate PS3s were subjected to 108 hours of game play and Blu-ray movies in different environments. The locations were a standard living room, the back of a freezer van, and the inside of a hot sauna–the screen and controllers were routed outside of the freezer van and sauna for the duration of the testing.

In living room testing, the only glitch reported for the console in 108 hours was a vibration in the disc tray. This apparently only lasted 20 seconds during the 12th hour of testing, with no other incidents reported. In the freezer test, the temperature was started at 50 degrees Fahrenheit and reduced to 0 degrees during the 108 hours. Except for sluggish behavior at 0 degrees and condensation on the video cord causing a video blackout, the console kept on running. In the sauna test, the temperature was started at 100 degrees and moved up to 120 during the last 24 hours of the test. Amazingly, the only reported incidents during the sauna test was a burning smell at hour 64 and a very hot console at the the end of the test. Otherwise, the PS3 console operated normally.

It sure must be nice to have that kind of disposable income to risk utter destruction of several PS3s. Can’t say I’m willing to repeat these tests myself. I’ll just try and kill gaming consoles the old fashioned way by playing them until they break."



Its good to know that the 360S is extremely reliable.