Barozi said:
oni-link said:
Barozi said:
oni-link said:
greenmedic88 said:
Not if they shelf the franchise indefinitely. e
|
I don't think Nintendo will shelf the Metroid series because Other M sold "ONLY" 500K copies in it's first month!!! In addition, the Metroid series on average has been about 800K-1.4M units in sales and in any case Other M is on it's way in acheiveing those numbers. (I see sales of ~600K by christmas2010 and ~740K within a year of release and 850K-1M lifetime) The Conduit which is getting a sequel got even less than what Other M sold in month during it's lifetime. In addition, piracy (the Wii's achille's heel) has also played a part in softening sales for the game. One of the torrent sites I follow had 47K download for the title since it was released; and that's just one site. (that's why piracy is a cancer to this industry and I don't believe in that homebrew crap)
|
yeah because it's the developer's only halfway decent selling game. I bet Nintendo or even Team Ninja have some projects, that could lead to more profit.
|
Yeah, one of them being Other M, which is already a profitable venture for both Team Ninja and Nintendo; seeing the average cost to develop and market a Wii game and how many copies this game had already sold and should sell this holiday season!!!
|
they'll make a relatively small profit at the end of the day. But you don't seem to get what I'm saying. Nintendo has much much much bigger game series than Metroid. They could've made Mario Party 9 or even Wii Music 2 *shudder* in the meantime, so again no matter how profitable Metroid is, it's making less money than these potential titles, thus even losing profit, that is admittedly not there, but easily could have been there.
I'll say it again a huge company like Nintendo doesn't give a fuck about the profits of Metroid Other M. They're way to small to get really noticed, thus making it at least possible for Nintendo to maybe just shelf the whole franchise.
|
Except Nintendo rightly doesn't work that way. All series have to be profitable, yes, but Nintendo still maintain a wide range of series that don't make the sales that their top games do (Fire Emblem, Advance Wars, Kirby etc. etc.) because a console needs more than just the infrequent big titles, it needs a regular stream of mid-level hits too.
And no, Nintendo would never have put Sakamoto and Team Ninja on Wii Music 2 (or Mario Party while Wii Party was in development), because that would have to be done by one of their top teams.
A game I'm developing with some friends:
www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm
It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.