It's only a tech demo, nothing is confirmed.

I really think the PSP is dead, Sony needs a new name and a new game. If you happen to slap the PSP name on the new handheld it's almost guaranteed to be second place.

It is okay to own a Nintendo console or handheld if you are mostly an HD gamer, what I am referring to is that some people may ignore the fact that it is a product of Nintendo.

Nope, it was actually announced as full release, complete with touchscreen item swapping.  They're also doing a Starfox 64 remake.

i actrually feel its up to us gamers to advertise this

how do you advertise something that is 3d to people who can't see it in 3d.  It will take off and be huge if us gamers who get this show this to other people.  Jus tlike how the Wii became huge from jus tother people trying it. 

The Wii's successor is unlikely to get such support as PS360 are extremely good at selling software

DS's competitor was terrible at selling software.

Sony needs to come out with the PSP2 very soon! And make it 3D.

If this becomes the case, it's the fault of Japan, not Nintendo. If you notice, the top selling console this gen (Wii) may not even pass the PSP in hardware, the "losing" handheld. The PSP has been getting pretty damn good 3rd party support this gen...

As for the topic, I think Sony should give up on PSP2, unless they have some sort of revolutionary idea. If their system turns out to be just a more powerful 3DS, they'll get "Gamecubed." Sony lives on 3rd party support, and if 3DS takes it away, they're completely screwed.

Like others have said, they should probably just make a gaming phone feature device that can compete with the iPhone and other smart phones.

Again, depends entirely on the software.  It's better for some (most really), but not for all (Sega, Hudson... even Namco Bandai, Capcom and Ubisoft had the biggest returns on Wii last FY versus other systems).  It's also generally worse for legacy franchises versus last generation on PS2 (plus GC & Xbox), which is more the issue imo.

Wii's successor will be launching from a far, far stronger position than Wii did, and PS4/Xbox 3 will probably be launching from a weaker position than PS3/Xbox 2 did in developer's minds...

Depends on the architecture of future consoles too. If they can have 1 game as a multiplat across PS3/720/Wii2 then it won't matter.

SEGA not doing well is their own fault or the marketings fault (Valkyria Chronicles). Same with Namco Bandai.

Capcom has done well with RE5, maybe nothing else though.

those day's are over..

3RD party EXCLUSIVES are pretty much a thing of the past.

it's not about loosing it's about you have to convince the 3rd party to go exclusive IE: some compensation!

Nintendo rarely does that an why should they their 1st party does great. without that

think about this The Wii is the only system that was not multi-core processor that means their game engines were not designed toward Multi-core thus already Sony and Microsoft has done just that multi-core development. not to say Nintendo has not done some but this point forward the Game engine's were the big expense some taking over 4 year's to make. that was one of the big expenses this generation , though next generation most likely be just as expensive but no moreso than this generation.

the Wii on the other hand was the cheapest , next generation not so much so. that mean's there is no Multi-core Wii game engine's yes they can make them. but both sony an Microsoft already have them.

And since Nintendo does not make their own CPU chip's they have to go to other's Say Intel?

almost all INTEL CPU's are CPU/GPU hybrid chip's for Embeded devices. which Game console's are. they went with IBM this time..even IBM are CPU/GPU chip's AMD, Freescale..etc.

that going to be a main problem..the Wii next replacement is going to have to overcome.