Is that somehow worth less than the people that think it will be amazing or one of the biggest exclusives based on a 10 second vague description by somebody who had nothing to with development?

And the fact that it's being developed by Rockstar North. Which is a positive.

Depends who you talk to. 

You might look at Red Dead Redemption as a fantasic game but other people might see it as a buggy barely working mess.  You might love sandbox games but other people might despise those type of games.

I'm sure which type your are.

I actually love Red Dead :-p

I was merely pointing the hypocrisy that goes on sometimes.

-edit-

And I'm not trying to pick on Kantor, I'm just pointing out it's pointless to get onto someone about not being excited for the game unless you also get onto the people hyping the game.

I don't think RDR is Rockstar North. Rockstar North has been disappointing this gen, and that's putting it mildly.

Why are people still doubting this anyways?

You guys DO know why Agent is exclusive right? After L.A Noire was supposed to be for PS3 and then went multi, Sony had a meeting with Take-Two and Rockstar and then that's where Agent came up, and from there they signed a deal. Instead of asking for the money from L.A Noire back they came up with a new game in return.

I can pretty well gaurentee this won't be going multiplatform.

And people talking about the episodes for GTAIV, M$ paid for timed-exlusivity, not 100% exlusive. As if Rockstar would make that an exclusive when it sold so well on PS3 as well, and Sony and Rockstar have 1000x the relationship than M$ and Rockstar.

So Agent wouldn't sell well on the 360? Your logic is flawed.

I fixed my post.

And where did I say it won't sell on 360?

The saying is SONY put money into LA Noire...but the project was a disaster and SONY lost that money (LA Noire was for PS2 initially)

So now "Agent" is like a repayment for that money. I heard that on some podcast.