By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Will Obama be re-elected in 2012?

 

Will Obama be re-elected in 2012?

Yes 111 37.00%
 
No 98 32.67%
 
Too early to call 79 26.33%
 
I don't know 12 4.00%
 
Total:300
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.



Around the Network

if he does re elect he wud lose



sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.


why not blame him. the president is always the fall guy. bush for katrina, and Obama will be for the oil spill. America doesn't care about international law. we always look for someone to blame.



sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.

 

i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.

P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.



Armads said:
Kasz216 said:

Just to show how unestablishment the current mood is.  A poltician in South Carlonia lost a primary election to an unemployed Army guy who didn't even run a campaign.


And yet Haley and Lincoln both managed to win their primaries event though they were incumbent.  Haley is also from SC so to say that the whole state is furious with incumbents because they went with a relative unknown isn't entirely true.  Also Rep. Rob Whitman, Scott Rigell, and Sen. Robert Hurt all were victorious over their Tea party challengers even though they all had massive establishment support.  I personally think that this will not be incumbency armageddon as the media proclaims.  Sure some people will lose to up and coming challengers, but we aren't going to see the hill populated entirely by new faces.

 

How was Haley an incumbent, now?



Around the Network
badgenome said:
Armads said:
Kasz216 said:

Just to show how unestablishment the current mood is.  A poltician in South Carlonia lost a primary election to an unemployed Army guy who didn't even run a campaign.


And yet Haley and Lincoln both managed to win their primaries event though they were incumbent.  Haley is also from SC so to say that the whole state is furious with incumbents because they went with a relative unknown isn't entirely true.  Also Rep. Rob Whitman, Scott Rigell, and Sen. Robert Hurt all were victorious over their Tea party challengers even though they all had massive establishment support.  I personally think that this will not be incumbency armageddon as the media proclaims.  Sure some people will lose to up and coming challengers, but we aren't going to see the hill populated entirely by new faces.

 

How was Haley an incumbent, now?


Oh you know what I read an article wrong, seems she wans't an incumbent.



MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.

 

i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.

P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs



HappySqurriel said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.

 

i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.

P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Good to see you actually pulled some videos out that have reality involved.



sguy78 said:
HappySqurriel said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.

 

i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.

P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Regardless of what you wrote, the implication you made was that Bush caused this recession. One sitting President does not create a recession. There is plenty of blame to go around, but recessions are cyclical anyways. We should have gone into a recession in America earlier than we did. Gee, it couldn't be Bill Clinton who intoduced legislation opening up risky loans to people who really didn't qualify for them? Everybody deserves a chance to own ther own home, right? I'm not going to say that Clinton caused the recession because of just that. Also, Clinton wasn't the reason we got a surplus. It was Newt, and the Republican House. Get your facts straight before you continue on with the "Bush 8 years apocalypse!" crap.

I think you should watch the videos ...



HappySqurriel said:
sguy78 said:
HappySqurriel said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
sguy78 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
PDF said:

Way to early to call.  Just like always though, people i know voted for him now bitch about him.  It sickens me how fast this country turns on our presidents.



he didn't have a chance. it took 8 yr's to get a surpluse under clinton, one yr' to blow the surpluse under Bush, 8 yr's to kill not just the American economy but the global economy under Bush. (and several large finacial firms)

I just couldn't stop laughing after reading this post. If you actually think Bush caused this recession you are living in a dreamworld.

 

i see you didn't even look at the side not where i said and other large financial firms. your just looking for something in nothing.

P.S i don't dream but i do sleep well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Regardless of what you wrote, the implication you made was that Bush caused this recession. One sitting President does not create a recession. There is plenty of blame to go around, but recessions are cyclical anyways. We should have gone into a recession in America earlier than we did. Gee, it couldn't be Bill Clinton who intoduced legislation opening up risky loans to people who really didn't qualify for them? Everybody deserves a chance to own ther own home, right? I'm not going to say that Clinton caused the recession because of just that. Also, Clinton wasn't the reason we got a surplus. It was Newt, and the Republican House. Get your facts straight before you continue on with the "Bush 8 years apocalypse!" crap.

I think you should watch the videos ...

I did. I'm just tired of this whole Bush is the reason for everything bad that happens. I'm surprised we haven't heard some conspiracy theory that Bush caused this oil spill 10 hours before he left office. I mean, we all know how much he hates black people in the Louisiana area.