By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - 9 dead as Israeli forces board Gaza aid Convoy

mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:

Going by the facts which you don't even know apparently.

It sounds like you made up your mind BEFORE you knew the facts and now are simply unwilling to change your opinion.

Also, well YES that is the only way they could of stopped the ship some other way.

Without risking the deaths of EVERYBODY anyway.   IF they attacked the rudders or Engines even the littlest wave could of cause them to accidently sink the damn thing.  Heck it might not even take that.  These kind of ships used for floatillia's are usually weak out of date ships that haven't been in regular service or matience for years.  

I guess if you think it'd be a better option to possibly kill EVERBODY.  That's fine.

 

Nevermind the fact that you then have to send people on the ship anyway to either evacuate the people or to hook up a towing line.

My mind was actually made upwhen I read about what happened after several days, hence why I was late to the thread. As for information known, I doubt even you have all the facts on how things stand, and are just as stubborn to change your opinion on this.

Furthermore, you neither know what the ship was biilt like, nor how it was built, or really any of that sort. In fact you are now using your lack of information and making your own mind up BEFORE you know how things stand in that area, something you just blamed me of doing. But I guess you can go ahead and speculate as well.

As for your following post, the mob did not go to the commandos, the commandos came to the mob. The commandos were in absolutely no threat up in their helicopter, and they went and invaded an obviously hostile mob of people. Then they wonder why they got hit on the head with metal rods. So no, they had no right to use lethal force whatsoever.

I have more facts then you did... and since then... all of the facts have broke towards my side.

I know plenty about that area.  It's a shitty situation for everbody caused by england.  Doesn't change the fact that Israel did nothing wrong here.

Your just backpeddaling now because you don't want to admit you were wrong.  I mean, did you not notice the fact that the other ships were boarded fine?  It was a six ship floatilla and trouble only happened on one ship.

Your only suggestion now is "they shouldn't of landed" with no actual other suggestion on how to stop the ship.

Just admit you were wrong.   Or how would you have disabled the ship?


By "that area" I actually meant the ship's condition and apparent ability to be sunk by a breeze.

Also, just because they landed just fine on the other boats, I am sure that the people here saw the the ones on this particular boat were not as friendly as the ones on the other boat. I imagine that all the "weapons" everyone keeps quoting were not all that hard to see. The whole "others were boarded fine and the IDF didn't see this comning" is a very poor argument.  What did the IDF think those rods were for? Welcome parade?

The operatoin was a huge mistake. You don't board a ship full of painfully obvious rioters who mean you harm, and then expect them to surrender peacefully just like that? Hell, if Ididn't know any better I'd say  they were pulling the same schtick the flotilla was pulling. Throw a few people in the lion's mouth, then wait for the excuse to shoot. Then again, nowing how Israel reacts this could have some turth to it as well.

FInally, I don't have any better idea on how to handle this because I studied computers, not military tactics. However I expect people who have studied military tactics to perform far above what was displayed here, and not come up with something your average person can come up with.

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.



Around the Network

Also, as for doing it another way...

you should consider the fact that... well that's just how it's done.

That's how it was handled in the 1950's by the British as well... when the Jewish people were trying to get to Palestine.

The EXACT same scenario happened then.  It's likely actually Standard operation procedure and the "smartest" option there is, as different armies use the same tactic.

 

I'd also say to consider the fact that fists are infact lethal weapons.  Even being unarmed you can kill a person.  Not a few days ago I had a friend who's Mom's boyfriend was beaten so badly they were worried he might have brain damage by a just a few people.

A crowd can very eaisly kill. 



Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:

Going by the facts which you don't even know apparently.

It sounds like you made up your mind BEFORE you knew the facts and now are simply unwilling to change your opinion.

Also, well YES that is the only way they could of stopped the ship some other way.

Without risking the deaths of EVERYBODY anyway.   IF they attacked the rudders or Engines even the littlest wave could of cause them to accidently sink the damn thing.  Heck it might not even take that.  These kind of ships used for floatillia's are usually weak out of date ships that haven't been in regular service or matience for years.  

I guess if you think it'd be a better option to possibly kill EVERBODY.  That's fine.

 

Nevermind the fact that you then have to send people on the ship anyway to either evacuate the people or to hook up a towing line.

My mind was actually made upwhen I read about what happened after several days, hence why I was late to the thread. As for information known, I doubt even you have all the facts on how things stand, and are just as stubborn to change your opinion on this.

Furthermore, you neither know what the ship was biilt like, nor how it was built, or really any of that sort. In fact you are now using your lack of information and making your own mind up BEFORE you know how things stand in that area, something you just blamed me of doing. But I guess you can go ahead and speculate as well.

As for your following post, the mob did not go to the commandos, the commandos came to the mob. The commandos were in absolutely no threat up in their helicopter, and they went and invaded an obviously hostile mob of people. Then they wonder why they got hit on the head with metal rods. So no, they had no right to use lethal force whatsoever.

I have more facts then you did... and since then... all of the facts have broke towards my side.

I know plenty about that area.  It's a shitty situation for everbody caused by england.  Doesn't change the fact that Israel did nothing wrong here.

Your just backpeddaling now because you don't want to admit you were wrong.  I mean, did you not notice the fact that the other ships were boarded fine?  It was a six ship floatilla and trouble only happened on one ship.

Your only suggestion now is "they shouldn't of landed" with no actual other suggestion on how to stop the ship.

Just admit you were wrong.   Or how would you have disabled the ship?


By "that area" I actually meant the ship's condition and apparent ability to be sunk by a breeze.

Also, just because they landed just fine on the other boats, I am sure that the people here saw the the ones on this particular boat were not as friendly as the ones on the other boat. I imagine that all the "weapons" everyone keeps quoting were not all that hard to see. The whole "others were boarded fine and the IDF didn't see this comning" is a very poor argument.  What did the IDF think those rods were for? Welcome parade?

The operatoin was a huge mistake. You don't board a ship full of painfully obvious rioters who mean you harm, and then expect them to surrender peacefully just like that? Hell, if Ididn't know any better I'd say  they were pulling the same schtick the flotilla was pulling. Throw a few people in the lion's mouth, then wait for the excuse to shoot. Then again, nowing how Israel reacts this could have some turth to it as well.

FInally, I don't have any better idea on how to handle this because I studied computers, not military tactics. However I expect people who have studied military tactics to perform far above what was displayed here, and not come up with something your average person can come up with.

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.

I don't expect the common man to come up with anything even close to what I can do with a computer. I would hope that people who are trained in military tactics cane come up with maneuvers that the common person, like you and I, cannot come up with. Otherwise it means they had pisspoor education.

Your analogy would be better if it went something like this. I see that the computer has a faulty HDD, not unexpectedly, and I put on a full load to be written, then I act surprised when it fails. If you are trying to tell me that the IDF did not know to expect hostility, then they must either have been blind, dumb, or mentally retarded. 

You are trying to tell me that small mobs, isolated on a boat, are practically invulnerable to most common tactics and need to be shot to be calmed down. I just want you to think of just how horrible that sounds considering that he mobs and riots that involve soccer games are much bigger, better armed, and certainly not isolated in the sea, and the police actually killing those rioters happens almost never. They trample on each other, sure, but it's not the police that kills them.



mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:

Going by the facts which you don't even know apparently.

It sounds like you made up your mind BEFORE you knew the facts and now are simply unwilling to change your opinion.

Also, well YES that is the only way they could of stopped the ship some other way.

Without risking the deaths of EVERYBODY anyway.   IF they attacked the rudders or Engines even the littlest wave could of cause them to accidently sink the damn thing.  Heck it might not even take that.  These kind of ships used for floatillia's are usually weak out of date ships that haven't been in regular service or matience for years.  

I guess if you think it'd be a better option to possibly kill EVERBODY.  That's fine.

 

Nevermind the fact that you then have to send people on the ship anyway to either evacuate the people or to hook up a towing line.

My mind was actually made upwhen I read about what happened after several days, hence why I was late to the thread. As for information known, I doubt even you have all the facts on how things stand, and are just as stubborn to change your opinion on this.

Furthermore, you neither know what the ship was biilt like, nor how it was built, or really any of that sort. In fact you are now using your lack of information and making your own mind up BEFORE you know how things stand in that area, something you just blamed me of doing. But I guess you can go ahead and speculate as well.

As for your following post, the mob did not go to the commandos, the commandos came to the mob. The commandos were in absolutely no threat up in their helicopter, and they went and invaded an obviously hostile mob of people. Then they wonder why they got hit on the head with metal rods. So no, they had no right to use lethal force whatsoever.

I have more facts then you did... and since then... all of the facts have broke towards my side.

I know plenty about that area.  It's a shitty situation for everbody caused by england.  Doesn't change the fact that Israel did nothing wrong here.

Your just backpeddaling now because you don't want to admit you were wrong.  I mean, did you not notice the fact that the other ships were boarded fine?  It was a six ship floatilla and trouble only happened on one ship.

Your only suggestion now is "they shouldn't of landed" with no actual other suggestion on how to stop the ship.

Just admit you were wrong.   Or how would you have disabled the ship?


By "that area" I actually meant the ship's condition and apparent ability to be sunk by a breeze.

Also, just because they landed just fine on the other boats, I am sure that the people here saw the the ones on this particular boat were not as friendly as the ones on the other boat. I imagine that all the "weapons" everyone keeps quoting were not all that hard to see. The whole "others were boarded fine and the IDF didn't see this comning" is a very poor argument.  What did the IDF think those rods were for? Welcome parade?

The operatoin was a huge mistake. You don't board a ship full of painfully obvious rioters who mean you harm, and then expect them to surrender peacefully just like that? Hell, if Ididn't know any better I'd say  they were pulling the same schtick the flotilla was pulling. Throw a few people in the lion's mouth, then wait for the excuse to shoot. Then again, nowing how Israel reacts this could have some turth to it as well.

FInally, I don't have any better idea on how to handle this because I studied computers, not military tactics. However I expect people who have studied military tactics to perform far above what was displayed here, and not come up with something your average person can come up with.

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.

I don't expect the common man to come up with anything even close to what I can do with a computer. I would hope that people who are trained in military tactics cane come up with maneuvers that the common person, like you and I, cannot come up with. Otherwise it means they had pisspoor education.

Your analogy would be better if it went something like this. I see that the computer has a faulty HDD, not unexpectedly, and I put on a full load to be written, then I act surprised when it fails. If you are trying to tell me that the IDF did not know to expect hostility, then they must either have been blind, dumb, or mentally retarded. 

You are trying to tell me that small mobs, isolated on a boat, are practically invulnerable to most common tactics and need to be shot to be calmed down. I just want you to think of just how horrible that sounds considering that he mobs and riots that involve soccer games are much bigger, better armed, and certainly not isolated in the sea, and the police actually killing those rioters happens almost never. They trample on each other, sure, but it's not the police that kills them.

So... why is this standard operation procedure... for everbody if there are so many better ways.

You just want to believe there is a better way, when their isn't.

Or you know... SOMEBODY else would use them.



mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:

Going by the facts which you don't even know apparently.

It sounds like you made up your mind BEFORE you knew the facts and now are simply unwilling to change your opinion.

Also, well YES that is the only way they could of stopped the ship some other way.

Without risking the deaths of EVERYBODY anyway.   IF they attacked the rudders or Engines even the littlest wave could of cause them to accidently sink the damn thing.  Heck it might not even take that.  These kind of ships used for floatillia's are usually weak out of date ships that haven't been in regular service or matience for years.  

I guess if you think it'd be a better option to possibly kill EVERBODY.  That's fine.

 

Nevermind the fact that you then have to send people on the ship anyway to either evacuate the people or to hook up a towing line.

My mind was actually made upwhen I read about what happened after several days, hence why I was late to the thread. As for information known, I doubt even you have all the facts on how things stand, and are just as stubborn to change your opinion on this.

Furthermore, you neither know what the ship was biilt like, nor how it was built, or really any of that sort. In fact you are now using your lack of information and making your own mind up BEFORE you know how things stand in that area, something you just blamed me of doing. But I guess you can go ahead and speculate as well.

As for your following post, the mob did not go to the commandos, the commandos came to the mob. The commandos were in absolutely no threat up in their helicopter, and they went and invaded an obviously hostile mob of people. Then they wonder why they got hit on the head with metal rods. So no, they had no right to use lethal force whatsoever.

I have more facts then you did... and since then... all of the facts have broke towards my side.

I know plenty about that area.  It's a shitty situation for everbody caused by england.  Doesn't change the fact that Israel did nothing wrong here.

Your just backpeddaling now because you don't want to admit you were wrong.  I mean, did you not notice the fact that the other ships were boarded fine?  It was a six ship floatilla and trouble only happened on one ship.

Your only suggestion now is "they shouldn't of landed" with no actual other suggestion on how to stop the ship.

Just admit you were wrong.   Or how would you have disabled the ship?


By "that area" I actually meant the ship's condition and apparent ability to be sunk by a breeze.

Also, just because they landed just fine on the other boats, I am sure that the people here saw the the ones on this particular boat were not as friendly as the ones on the other boat. I imagine that all the "weapons" everyone keeps quoting were not all that hard to see. The whole "others were boarded fine and the IDF didn't see this comning" is a very poor argument.  What did the IDF think those rods were for? Welcome parade?

The operatoin was a huge mistake. You don't board a ship full of painfully obvious rioters who mean you harm, and then expect them to surrender peacefully just like that? Hell, if Ididn't know any better I'd say  they were pulling the same schtick the flotilla was pulling. Throw a few people in the lion's mouth, then wait for the excuse to shoot. Then again, nowing how Israel reacts this could have some turth to it as well.

FInally, I don't have any better idea on how to handle this because I studied computers, not military tactics. However I expect people who have studied military tactics to perform far above what was displayed here, and not come up with something your average person can come up with.

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.

I don't expect the common man to come up with anything even close to what I can do with a computer. I would hope that people who are trained in military tactics cane come up with maneuvers that the common person, like you and I, cannot come up with. Otherwise it means they had pisspoor education.

Your analogy would be better if it went something like this. I see that the computer has a faulty HDD, not unexpectedly, and I put on a full load to be written, then I act surprised when it fails. If you are trying to tell me that the IDF did not know to expect hostility, then they must either have been blind, dumb, or mentally retarded. 

You are trying to tell me that small mobs, isolated on a boat, are practically invulnerable to most common tactics and need to be shot to be calmed down. I just want you to think of just how horrible that sounds considering that he mobs and riots that involve soccer games are much bigger, better armed, and certainly not isolated in the sea, and the police actually killing those rioters happens almost never. They trample on each other, sure, but it's not the police that kills them.

The most sound tactical move would have been to wait for the boats to enter Israeli waters and sink them, would you have accepted that outcome?

Israel faces two significant tactical problems, they’re dealing with an irrational opponent, and they’re held to a double-standard. The irrational opponent is challenging because what a rational opponent would consider the least desirable outcome (typically death) is entirely acceptable; and the outcomes a rational opponent would see as acceptable (compromising to deliver aid) is entirely unacceptable to an irrational opponent. The double standard is particularly interesting because Israel is the only country where a genocidal madman can criticize them as being the worst human rights offenders and you will have people in the western world agree; if Stalin and Hitler were alive today they could constantly bash Israel and no one would bring up that they killed tens of millions of people.

Israel faces two significant tactical problems, they’re dealing with an irrational opponent, and they’re held to a double-standard. The irrational opponent is challenging because what a rational opponent would consider the least desirable outcome (typically death) is entirely acceptable; and the outcomes a rational opponent would see as acceptable (compromising to deliver aid) is entirely unacceptable to an irrational opponent. The double standard is particularly difficult because even if they were some how successful at peacefully diverting the ship and accepting and distributing the aid they would still be criticized based on their actions; and a genocidal madman could criticize their actions for being inhuman without ever being questioned by those opposed to Israel.



Around the Network
HappySqurriel said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:

Going by the facts which you don't even know apparently.

It sounds like you made up your mind BEFORE you knew the facts and now are simply unwilling to change your opinion.

Also, well YES that is the only way they could of stopped the ship some other way.

Without risking the deaths of EVERYBODY anyway.   IF they attacked the rudders or Engines even the littlest wave could of cause them to accidently sink the damn thing.  Heck it might not even take that.  These kind of ships used for floatillia's are usually weak out of date ships that haven't been in regular service or matience for years.  

I guess if you think it'd be a better option to possibly kill EVERBODY.  That's fine.

 

Nevermind the fact that you then have to send people on the ship anyway to either evacuate the people or to hook up a towing line.

My mind was actually made upwhen I read about what happened after several days, hence why I was late to the thread. As for information known, I doubt even you have all the facts on how things stand, and are just as stubborn to change your opinion on this.

Furthermore, you neither know what the ship was biilt like, nor how it was built, or really any of that sort. In fact you are now using your lack of information and making your own mind up BEFORE you know how things stand in that area, something you just blamed me of doing. But I guess you can go ahead and speculate as well.

As for your following post, the mob did not go to the commandos, the commandos came to the mob. The commandos were in absolutely no threat up in their helicopter, and they went and invaded an obviously hostile mob of people. Then they wonder why they got hit on the head with metal rods. So no, they had no right to use lethal force whatsoever.

I have more facts then you did... and since then... all of the facts have broke towards my side.

I know plenty about that area.  It's a shitty situation for everbody caused by england.  Doesn't change the fact that Israel did nothing wrong here.

Your just backpeddaling now because you don't want to admit you were wrong.  I mean, did you not notice the fact that the other ships were boarded fine?  It was a six ship floatilla and trouble only happened on one ship.

Your only suggestion now is "they shouldn't of landed" with no actual other suggestion on how to stop the ship.

Just admit you were wrong.   Or how would you have disabled the ship?


By "that area" I actually meant the ship's condition and apparent ability to be sunk by a breeze.

Also, just because they landed just fine on the other boats, I am sure that the people here saw the the ones on this particular boat were not as friendly as the ones on the other boat. I imagine that all the "weapons" everyone keeps quoting were not all that hard to see. The whole "others were boarded fine and the IDF didn't see this comning" is a very poor argument.  What did the IDF think those rods were for? Welcome parade?

The operatoin was a huge mistake. You don't board a ship full of painfully obvious rioters who mean you harm, and then expect them to surrender peacefully just like that? Hell, if Ididn't know any better I'd say  they were pulling the same schtick the flotilla was pulling. Throw a few people in the lion's mouth, then wait for the excuse to shoot. Then again, nowing how Israel reacts this could have some turth to it as well.

FInally, I don't have any better idea on how to handle this because I studied computers, not military tactics. However I expect people who have studied military tactics to perform far above what was displayed here, and not come up with something your average person can come up with.

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.

I don't expect the common man to come up with anything even close to what I can do with a computer. I would hope that people who are trained in military tactics cane come up with maneuvers that the common person, like you and I, cannot come up with. Otherwise it means they had pisspoor education.

Your analogy would be better if it went something like this. I see that the computer has a faulty HDD, not unexpectedly, and I put on a full load to be written, then I act surprised when it fails. If you are trying to tell me that the IDF did not know to expect hostility, then they must either have been blind, dumb, or mentally retarded. 

You are trying to tell me that small mobs, isolated on a boat, are practically invulnerable to most common tactics and need to be shot to be calmed down. I just want you to think of just how horrible that sounds considering that he mobs and riots that involve soccer games are much bigger, better armed, and certainly not isolated in the sea, and the police actually killing those rioters happens almost never. They trample on each other, sure, but it's not the police that kills them.

The most sound tactical move would have been to wait for the boats to enter Israeli waters and sink them, would you have accepted that outcome?

Israel faces two significant tactical problems, they’re dealing with an irrational opponent, and they’re held to a double-standard. The irrational opponent is challenging because what a rational opponent would consider the least desirable outcome (typically death) is entirely acceptable; and the outcomes a rational opponent would see as acceptable (compromising to deliver aid) is entirely unacceptable to an irrational opponent. The double standard is particularly interesting because Israel is the only country where a genocidal madman can criticize them as being the worst human rights offenders and you will have people in the western world agree; if Stalin and Hitler were alive today they could constantly bash Israel and no one would bring up that they killed tens of millions of people.

Israel faces two significant tactical problems, they’re dealing with an irrational opponent, and they’re held to a double-standard. The irrational opponent is challenging because what a rational opponent would consider the least desirable outcome (typically death) is entirely acceptable; and the outcomes a rational opponent would see as acceptable (compromising to deliver aid) is entirely unacceptable to an irrational opponent. The double standard is particularly difficult because even if they were some how successful at peacefully diverting the ship and accepting and distributing the aid they would still be criticized based on their actions; and a genocidal madman could criticize their actions for being inhuman without ever being questioned by those opposed to Israel.

It is pretty odd.

I found it funny that Hamas refused to allow ANY aid to come in, unless it was all aid.  Which in of itself is stupid. 

Of course that's another problem... none of the political parties in Palestine actually care about the Palestinians.

You've got one side that wants to set up a corrupt government and are willing to cost the lives and health of Israel.

Then a second group... who ALSO wants to do all that but is also firing rockets at Israel.

Why the heck they don't take the best deal they can get... give up worrying about a city that only has symbolic value, have the blockade end and let their people actually live, allowing further complaints to be soley made diplomatically at the UN I have no Idea.

Only a fool lets his offer plummet to nothing because he once turn downd a better offer.



ah jewish,they think were stupid or what??how can a comondos military something or i dont know be throwing off the boat like this by innocents no armed civilians how try to help their people in need of foods and medicins,ahhh if only ..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



mirgro said:
Kasz216 said:
...

So in otherwords.  You are just critical towards the Israeli's because you want to.

How would you feel if you tried to fix a computer, something happens unexpectedly, the computer broke and somebody said "Well I know nothing about computers, I'm not even sure how to turn one on, but as someone who knows something about computers... you should of did better."

Even though there was a very good possibility it was IMPOSSIBLE to fix said computer.

If you don't know enough to come up with a better way to handle it, you have no right to complain how it's handled... because you have no frame of refrence for making judgement.

As for not being sure of the ships structure there... yeah I don't know.... and neither did Israel.  Which is why... you know, you'd show caution... rathr then launching a bunch of explosives at the peace mission.

I don't expect the common man to come up with anything even close to what I can do with a computer. I would hope that people who are trained in military tactics cane come up with maneuvers that the common person, like you and I, cannot come up with. Otherwise it means they had pisspoor education.

Your analogy would be better if it went something like this. I see that the computer has a faulty HDD, not unexpectedly, and I put on a full load to be written, then I act surprised when it fails. If you are trying to tell me that the IDF did not know to expect hostility, then they must either have been blind, dumb, or mentally retarded. 

You are trying to tell me that small mobs, isolated on a boat, are practically invulnerable to most common tactics and need to be shot to be calmed down. I just want you to think of just how horrible that sounds considering that he mobs and riots that involve soccer games are much bigger, better armed, and certainly not isolated in the sea, and the police actually killing those rioters happens almost never. They trample on each other, sure, but it's not the police that kills them.


Well it is not that easy to board a ship. Usually it is done by boarding from small fast boats or by soldiers droped from helicopters.

Israel soldiers used boats to board all other ships without any incidents. You can see this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ba0iXUzxu0

IDF tries to board Marmara the same way unsuccessfully.  You can see this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6sAEYpHF24

It is hard to board a ship that way if there is a resistance. You are vulnerable climbing up to the people on the ship. There is also a very efective weapon against this method - water jets. That is why many companies start to produce water cannones agaist pirates:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-tG8dNJp7o

As you can see form the second link, people from the ship throw objets, stun grenades, fired projectiles from slingshots and used fire hoses as water cannones to prevent soldiers from boarding. The only way is to shoot to clear an area. This is a how somali pirates capture ships. They start shooting before climbing up, but for obvious reasons israel soldiers didn't want to start shooting first.

That is why next step form IDF was to attack Marmara with soldiers droped from helicopters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYjkLUcbJWo

An again this method is not easy against a mob. Soldiers are coming down one by one and are vulnerable to attacks from people on the deck. As you can see from the last video first few soldiers are badly beaten and they can't protect themself cos they are numerically inferior. You need to have a group so they can protect each other and you can't drop to many people cos space in helicopters is limited.

Now about your comparison of the situation with football games.
First - football fans are checked before entering and usually attack rival fans, not police. They don't have metal rods or knifes and policemen are always in groups. It is not easy to fight with bear hands against policemen with sticks and shields. Is it? Even this can't ensure that police can handle the situation. In Heysel Stadium disaster 39 people die. In Argentina, over 70 people died in 1968 in a single game.
That is why fatal clashes are always outside the stadiums were hooligans can get weapons. Some recent examples:
- On 24 November 2006 a PSG fan was shot and killed by police and another seriously injured during fighting between PSG fans and the police.
http://www.farenet.org/default.asp?intPageID=7&intArticleID=1217

- On 11 November 2007 Lazio fan was shot dead by police.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=481140&cc=5739



Don't forget the fact that organizers claimed that all passengers are peaceful activists with no weapons. If you wonder how they menage to got so many metal rods. This is how:
They used electric saws to saw metal rods off of the ship's deck. You can see that at 1:46
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16sANhzjcC0

They also had gas masks:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZlSSaPT_OU

Which means that they wanted to fight.



playnext3 said:

ah jewish,they think were stupid or what??how can a comondos military something or i dont know be throwing off the boat like this by innocents no armed civilians how try to help their people in need of foods and medicins,ahhh if only ..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Look at this post my friends, thats the result of arabic propaganda.

1. They had weapons.

2. The people in Gaza are usually richer than someone in simbabwe or somewhere else in africa, Israel gives them food, aid and so on. and by the way the gaza blockade is by egypt also



Fedor Emelianenko - Greatest Fighter and most humble man to ever walk the earth:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVrNOQtlzY