I did

It was the very first FF game I played actually. I found it rather odd, almost like Dragon Warrior (a.k.a Dragon Quest) meets Elder Scrolls, with the learn-by-doing system, which didn't benefit FFII. Thankfully I played FFI afterwards and found it a much more accesible experience.

Not that FFII was hard per se, but the time consumption needed to actually progress through the game was ridiculous. Either you had insane stats to get through bosses without having the best items, or you had the best items (which you needed an insane amount of gil to get, as enemies dropped a very minute amount of gil) to compensate the lack of stats. Either way, you needed to do a ridiculous amount of farming to get through.

You're correct, yet the descriptions of the abilities have been changed when it was ported to the GBA like Khuutra said and also when they released it on the PSX with FF Anthologies.

Actually I played the game on the Snes, but I couldn't recall the original name, so I went with what was more fresh in my mind. And I got it wrong, it was called Heartless Angel on the GBA version.

Nah, the SNES version was my second FF game.

FF4 was his first, which would explain his extraordinary love for it.

Dtewi I know a lot of people will humor you for overly reductive bullshit concerning what defines their tastes in video games, and a lot of people will participate in the back and forth banter that comes as a result of arguments over these points.

I am not one of those people.

I love FFIV for its own merits, appreciated it considerably more after playing the games that came after it, and will continue to appreciate it based on its own merits. That's all.

I think you have a faulty sarcasm detector, Khuutra.

You basically mixed the two names. For the record, I prefer Fallen One, it fits Kefka and it describes the spell well too since it leaves you with only 1HP.

speaking of awesome villians, I remembered Luca Blight, he was such a bastard too