By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Red Dead: Redemption ( Xbox360 ) Graphical Advantage?

Photo shop is really fun to use.



Around the Network
Squilliam said:
poroporo said:
psrock said:
I think I am going to get the 360 version for my PS3.

Seconded.

Thirded! Actually I'll take the Xbox 360 version on my PC3.

Fourth'd.  Ill take both the 360 and PS3 versions for my PC.  Will run better than both right? 2>1 Right? :)



Inferior graphicals ftw. Now to find that mary stash so that I dont give a damn as much... I know I forgot it around here somewhere...



 PROUD MEMBER OF THE  PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

Added Gametrailers comparison video to the OP.

 

 



PS4 Preordered - 06/11/2013 @09:30am

XBox One Preordered - 06/19/2013 @07:57pm

"I don't trust #XboxOne & #Kinect 2.0, it's always connected" as you tweet from your smartphone - irony 0_o

We get it Sega4life the 360 version is infinitely better and no one in their right mind should buy the PS3 version.



Around the Network

Is there a difference in those screen shots? Or did you just post duplicates?



Well here's the Lens of Truth comparison:
http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=19855

I think you need to sign up since it's a members only comparison (Not sure why they do that...)

But basically, the differences are pretty minor, the only difference is that the PS3 version was done in a lower resolution upscaled (Every CoD game has this, Alan Wake has this, Splinter Cell has this, it really isn't a problem), they use different Anti Alaising techniques, the draw distance for shadows on the PS3 isn't as good, and there's less shrubbery. But otherwise, they're pretty spot on, and I don't see why people should feel the need to complain.

Seriously, people were saying this port is as bad as the Bayonetta one, no, it really isn't, I mean, it's not a good port, but it's not a bad one either, it's on par with the GTAIV port, which in my opinion was still playable... check out the comparison I posted and see for yourself.



jbrist said:
Well here's the Lens of Truth comparison:
http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p=19855

I think you need to sign up since it's a members only comparison (Not sure why they do that...)

But basically, the differences are pretty minor, the only difference is that the PS3 version was done in a lower resolution upscaled (Every CoD game has this, Alan Wake has this, Splinter Cell has this, it really isn't a problem), they use different Anti Alaising techniques, the draw distance for shadows on the PS3 isn't as good, and there's less shrubbery. But otherwise, they're pretty spot on, and I don't see why people should feel the need to complain.

Seriously, people were saying this port is as bad as the Bayonetta one, no, it really isn't, I mean, it's not a good port, but it's not a bad one either, it's on par with the GTAIV port, which in my opinion was still playable... check out the comparison I posted and see for yourself.

so this basically confirms RDR is not as bad on ps3 as some people made it out to be, no framerate problem, it is a lower resolution and has less objects such as shrubbery, but on a plus the load times are so much better than x360, weird that.

the ps3 version is not a bad port at all and this is a small difference compared to some ports (not bringing it up as I don't want to get banned)



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1