KylieDog said:
Khuutra said:
It is good to know that my misunderstanding was laid to re-NO WAIT AAAAAAAAAAAAAGH
Truly good games do no age that poorly; Super Mario Bros. is as good a game now as it was 25 years ago.
|
In your opinion, but if Nintendo put it on disc and released it for Wii at £40/$60 do you think it would review well? If it is still as good it gets at least a 9/10 right?
|
It depends on whether or not yu see content as a valid value proposal, and hether or not content is necessarily tied into presentation, and whether or not content had anything to do with what's come before.
Let's rephrase, shall we?
In order to make an identical value proposition, we have to assume that up to now Super Mario Bros. never existed, and that as a result the platforming genre as we know it also never existed, probably kept more to someting like Pitfall until the jump to 3-D and thereafter more or less forgotten.
Would Super Mario Bros. still review in a very high range if it released today for the first time? Certainly. The game's mechanics and level design are still impeccable.