You brought it upon yourself.  And I find it hilarious that you continue to come up with new ways to argue when you repeated my entire post with your last sentence.  Can't you even see how you're contradicting yourself?  If Muramasa offers an 'experience more suited for someone', then that means they think its a better game than God of War.  No amount of arguing about 'AI' and 'Graphics' is going to make them think God of War 3 is a better game when they personally enjoyed Muramasa more.

@Ghost of Rubang I could not help but noticed that you left out some Key genres that Wii is not in the lead for, FPSs, racing and fighting. As a Wii and PS3 owner I enjoyed Muramasa but it was not the end all be all game. too much backtracking for one. AND if you acutally read the post the guy's friend is not into the "great" genres that Nintendo leads in. Personally my fav genre is fighting games so being a Wii only owner is simply not an option, hell PSP has more fighters than Wii. Your statement that Wii has something for everyone is not true, some people despise party games

Wii has never lacked games to warrant a purchase, not for people who play all sorts of games.

Depends what kind of games you like.

If you like FPS or RPG then no, its not worth the purchase. But if you like platformers, kart racing, party, fitness, etc. then its definitely worth it.

Yes, If you like RPGs you should get a Wii.

If Soul Caliber & Shattered Horizon taught us anything, it's that playing on a 3D plane is far harder than 2D, and difficulty is a challenge, which means entertainment and life span as someone is going to be more entertained by something which isn't a walk in the park.

Buddy, you just made up a whole bunch of genres there, so well done.
The wii does not lead in the majority of genres as you have literally made a bunch up. It does not lead in RTS', beat'em ups, FPS', RPG's, MMO's, third person adventure, third person action, arcade racing, simulation racing and so on. Those are all real genres.

Genres you have just made up include IR games, balance games, titling games and drinking games (clearly you've no idea what a drinking game is if you think it's on a console). What the wii does is it provides rail shooters, fitness games and party games with motion control. Plus what puzzle games does it lead with? Also a motion game isn't a genre, that's the controller interface.How many games are refered to as a keyboard and mouse game or a pad game?

The wii has the best ultra violent games? Clearly you've never played any game outside of the wii's library as Gears of War is far more violent and brutal then anything on the wii. Mad World is cell shaded B&W, that's hardly brutal & Manhunt 2 is multiplatform....
And no, it does not have the most 'classic games' - both 360 and PS3 have a back catalogue of games they can play, and nostalgia is hardly a good reason to buy a console as nostalgia does not mean the games are inherently good, just you have fond memories of said games. 

I never said everyone likes God of War, but would it be possible to talk to someone who has actually played on all three consoles then trying to argue about games they've never played? Kratos is emo? Clearly you've never played God of War 3, or have no idea what the word emo means (try PoP:Warrior Within).

Let me show you an example:

Which is the better film, Kick Ass or The Last King of Scotland?
Which did you enjoy more?

Now apply this to gaming. Making sense yet?

Having played both, I can confirm Muramasa is much harder than God of War 3. Plus, they can't be compared really. Muramasa has tons of RPG elements and looks, at least to me, much prettier than God of War 3. It's a matter of opinion which game you prefer. That's what it all comes down to in the end.

If I had seen either movie, perhaps I could even begin to understand your obscure analogy.  But all you're doing is making yourself seem more elitist and anyone who doesn't agree with your opinions (or understand your logic flow) is wrong.

Perhaps you should take a clue from the multiple people who have been trying to tell you the same thing in this thread.  Its now about how big budget or 'powerful' or 'technically superior' a game is.  Its about how much fun and enjoyment they had with it.  And as multiple people in this thread have already told you, they had more fun, and as a result liked, Muramasa more than God of War 3.

Obscure analogy? Other than one of the films is very recent and very popular, and another is oscar winning? Uhuh.....Think you need to pop your head out of the metaphorical basement.
I'll put the example another way. Which is better:
A childs finger painting of his family
            or
The Mona Lisa

Now the kid and his parent are going to enjoy the former more than the latter. Does that make it the better piece of work?

What I'm saying is that look at what makes a game good. Just because someone says it's fun doesn't mean it is good. Golden Eye WAS fun, but compared to all the other FPS' out there, it's jizz. The same has been said about Perfect Dark on XBL, that it's only really meant for nostalgia.

If you like hardcore titles, the wii is certianly not made for you. Out of the hardcore genres, either the 360 or PS3 have the leading titles. The wii is a party machine and offers a much more simplified gaming experience. Something like Murasma is outdone by other slash 'em up games like Bayonetta etc. The latter is far harder, and therefore longer lifespan/more interesting, to anyone who has a back history of playing games, as in a hardcore/seasoned gamer.