Kenryoku_Maxis said:
|
Mazty said:
Oh christ you didn't just do that....-.-
Galaxy is a platformer. It does what it sets out to do well by having relatively good visuals for the console, whilst having numerous varitation in levels, and a difficulty curve which is accessible and yet hard to master, which will ensure lengthy gameplay for those wanting to master it. Are you really going to say variation in a platformer is bad? Or making a difficulty curve which is accessible is bad?
Muramasa is offering a very different experience to God of War, but the hardcore gamer will appreciate God of War more because of the greater challenge it offers, as well as the evolution in gaming that hardcore gamers tend to look for e.g. 2.5D or 3D gaming.
Basically if someone says they think Muramasa is better than God of War, it is not for the reasons of Muramasa being a better game, it's that it offers an experience more suited for that person, technically speaking.
|
You brought it upon yourself. And I find it hilarious that you continue to come up with new ways to argue when you repeated my entire post with your last sentence. Can't you even see how you're contradicting yourself? If Muramasa offers an 'experience more suited for someone', then that means they think its a better game than God of War. No amount of arguing about 'AI' and 'Graphics' is going to make them think God of War 3 is a better game when they personally enjoyed Muramasa more.
|
Let me show you an example:
Which is the better film, Kick Ass or The Last King of Scotland?
Which did you enjoy more?
Now apply this to gaming. Making sense yet?
