That would be too smart.

1) I apologize then, I thought it was directly aimed at me lol And just for the record, I don't hate companies for being succeful.. ok except Activision.

2) And now I could say "250€ for a wii is expensive in my opinion" and therefor Nintendo could improve the original pack, starting by giving another controller - because that's the point of having a Wii right? Playing with friends offline. And then you'd say "but 250€ isn't expensive at all" and we'd start all over again lol

3) To be honest, nothing of that changes the fact that I have to pay much more than you for a Wii. But that happens to all (at least to most) products, the difference is that I couldn't possibly expect Sony to lower the PS3's price in Europe because they were already losing money per each console made. Nintendo wasn't.

4) I remember hearing Nintendo's Wii expectations were that it would sell over 80 millions. Hm... Maybe it was in late 2006/early 2007 (not before the Wii's release). But anyway, it isn't really fair to have to pay for a company's mystake.

5) Me neither to be honest.. And I didn't really understand that analogy. Well I understood it, but it doesn't make much sense... PS3's games are like... 10€ more expensive than the Wii's one? So what, one uses a blu-ray disc, it must be more expensive. Besides, PS3s games cost just as much as 360 games, at least in Portugal (70€). I have no reasons at all to complain about Sony. They didn't force me to buy a PS3 for 600€, I decided I wanted to, and I certainly don't regret it.

great joke thread! lol Mario on PS3

I think people should be glad Nintendo is holding its own. If it ever came down to them quitting the HW business, they wouldn't join forces with MS or Sony, but would likely form up with Apple, who would in turn eliminate all competition, like they have done in the portable music sector and cellphone sector. It'd end up becoming a 1 console generation within 2 generations from now.

Diversity isn't a bad thing. Hell, asthe Sony heads said "Get another job" if you want more than one console

I blame Wii Fit.

Again cliffhanger logic your point holds no ground and never will as the only improvement you can come up with is better looking games, your logic is again flawed here as the time between SMW and SMB is a whole gen so obviously the designers said we have ideas that can't be done on current hardware very much referencing Reggie's comment I brought up earlier and to kill off this part further look at the progression between SMB and SMB3 and this was on the same hardware not to mention SMB3 is the template that SMW is built on, by your logic it's like saying look at RE4 and then look at RE1 on PS1 and try and used it as a focal point to say why PS1 should of been more powerful. You're now comparing whole different gens with each other to try and prove your point rather then your initial stance that the Wii should of been as powerful as the PS3 to improve Galaxy as you can't think of any solid improvements a predictable move, different gens have loads of time between them for new ideas to form as R&D is constantly going on what the subject here is Nintendo's current venture not what they'll be doing next gen in this what if argument you're trying to push.

Nintendo's progression is based more on their creative path, they look at their ideas first then they fit the hardware around these ideas something you and various others don't seem to understand, they don't just bang out a console and then start developing for it their approach is set in stone long before the new gen. Why do you think Galaxy is one of the best looking games this gen let alone on the Wii and was out with in the first year, why do you think it's one of the best games in history as well as platform and will be remebered for years on end long after the likes of Gears and God of Wars, games like those don't just take months to throw together on a console both the hardware and software ideas were in sync and built from the ground up for each other that's how Nintendo have always operated. While everyone was thinking of more power they were thinking of MC so all this talk about if the Wii was as powerful as the PS3 is mute as the Wii is as powerful as Nintendo needed it to be as Nintendo already had their goals set.

because its Awesome right (no this isnt a Joke)

ROLF, you do realizes if you give a negative opinnion about anything nintendo related, you're gonna get flammed as hell (sometimes sony related too, but much less)?

Who's Rolf? And what does "flammed" mean, like a flim-flam, like a ripoff or something? And for the record you can say negative things about Nintendo (and especially MS) and be okay, but you can't post nonsense with nonsense logic and expect people to just ignore it. Unless you put how Sony does something better than Ninty or MS, then you get a lot of support.

as you can see, no you cant. guy said his opinnion and he got attacked hard. his opinnion might sound dumb and wrong to somebody but doesnt mean you can insult them.

Also, i find it great that you point out spelling mistakes on internet. really cool. People like you make internet a better place for our children

The first post in this thread would be more accurately described as "nonsense with nonsense logic" than a valid opinion. In particular, the claim that Nintendo has not made any excellent games should be considered trolling and warrants lots of teasing of the thread creator and his spelling.

Spelling is important, but without grammar and punctuation it is not enough. I fixed your previous post and have put the changes in bold for you. Between CommonMan and I, the internet should remain a good place for children to learn how to communicate properly.