| ssj12 said: W29 you are clearly violating way to many rules for your own good. Banned. |
PS3 will win the console wars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| ssj12 said: W29 you are clearly violating way to many rules for your own good. Banned. |
PS3 will win the console wars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Escort29 said:
Why you ban him? |
He was violating to many rules for his own good. Isnt that a simple explanation?
edit: I see you changed your post. Afraid you'll blow ur cover?
2008 end of year predictions:
PS3: 22M
360: 25M
wii: 40M
Soriku said:
Most random post of the day. |
that was just an alt account by W29. Frankly I dont see any console really winning this console war and if there is as winner it will be by the slighterst amrgin. I'm seeing a 33, 33, 34 split across the board but It will probably end up being more of a 45% 30% 25% still who knows its way to early to tell.


Oh christ, just as I added him to my friends list, he already makes an ass out of himself.
And people were actually suggesting he should be a mod, sigh...
Soriku said:
1. Yeah, I kinda figured he was W29 after his second post "This site sucks" or whatever 2. I think the Wii'll have about 55-60% market share. PS3 and 360...too early to tell. We have to see how Blu-ray progresses PLUS if PS3 manages to catch up to the 360 or not. |
PS3 first year seems to be even to slightly faster selling then the 360 so I think as long as the PS3 continues to get good gamesit has a good chance. Sony has. from the looks of it, fixed their marketing. That is a positive step.
I'm still wondering if the Wii will truly own more then 50% of the market by 2010. It seems like it very well could but I really cant tell. As long as Nintendo's plane doesnt run out of gas they will control the world's console market again.


Hey since this topic has been so utterly raped why don't we just turn it into discussing the EoG marketshare?
Personally I see it being 52 (wii) - 24 (ps3) - 24 (360) the 360-PS3 race looks very interesting with the 360 having the year headstart but the PS3 having an extra market.

GS reviews are usually all over the place, depending on who reviews it and what they think of the console/game series without going into it with a negative attitude.
Halo 3 was a OK game, but in my opinion didn't deserve a 9.5. After playing it I would give it a 8.5 at best. And the online is just horrendous. I don't even know why I renewed my Live subscription because I hardly go online with it anymore because of the rude children that play those games.
COD4 should have scored a 9.5 all around as it's just a great game and will keep me busy and interested in it longer then Halo 3 ever did and will keep me playing until Socom Confrontation comes out. After about a week I was sick and tired of Halo 3. The online was horrendous and the kids in the game ruined it for me.
Anyways, I always take GS reviews with a huge grain of salt and check to see what other sites review it at. If there is a big difference between GS and many other review sites like IGN, I will just write off GS's review and not go by that.
My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard. And they're like, "You wanna trade cards?" Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I'll trade this, but not my charizard.
| dtewi said: Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn has got a 6.0 from Gamespot for being too hard for newcomers and being a sequel. Halo 3 has got a 9.5 for being a sequel. Metroid Prime 3 got an 8.5 for being a sequel. Okay Gamespot makes me want to kill someone. They took 4 points off of FE for not being easy enough. That is total bullcrap. And they took points of because it is a sequel. Holy. Shit. Halo 3 got was praised for being a sequel, but Metroid wasn't, in fact it had 1.5 points taken off because of it. Is anyone thoroughly annoyed by Gamespot? Seriously this shit is annoying. Rated a game lower because it is on a certain system. WTF? That doesn't make it a worse game. I want to kill them. And a 7.5 for Ratchet and Clank? ...... die...... |
they also took off points for not having mii support