Well I played MAG and think it did great for an average online FPS with a gimmick. I dont think it will die off. It has a dedicated playerbase and the game modes can be tweaked as needed.
Well I played MAG and think it did great for an average online FPS with a gimmick. I dont think it will die off. It has a dedicated playerbase and the game modes can be tweaked as needed.
hollywood85 said:
lol what better games are there? name 1 game that provides a MAG experience better than MAG, |
You mean the best 256 pleyer experience? Well, I guess MAG wins at that, too bad that doesn't really matter too much. Once you get past that rush, and it takes longer to get to that than it does to get past it, all you have left is a passable at best shooter. The field is just a little too crowded for a multiplayer only passable at best shooter to be remembered a year from now.
As far as shooters go, there's Bad Company 2, Modern Warfare, and Killzone 2. Take your pick, from what I hear from my friends that wet themselves over all things shooters, all of those are infintely better than MAG.
hollywood85 said:
and that's what's wrong with casual gamers, if you played MAG you'd understand it's way more than just 256 players...... |
That's why I say always advertise your KEY FEATURE,that's fucking important.
you know that game that was released very close to it...what was the name of the game...ahhhh
Battlefield: Bad Company 2....yeah...that's all i have to say
I actually haven't played MAG for a while now, bought it, played for like a week, and forgot about it, not because it was bad, because I was bombarded with work and other games, but I got around to playing it again last night with the updates etc. and the new DLC, and my oh my, it actually felt better than the first time I played it, and there were more people online too o.O