twesterm said:
It's not a question of why wouldn't I want it? it's a question of what do I want them to sacrifice? Would you rather they make a game that did alright at the sword controls and had multiplayer or would you rather they concentrate their effort on sword controls so they make a game with the best sword motion controls we've seen yet? Adding multiplayer isn't as simple as pressing a button and then done. It takes a lot of time, effort, and money. If they had put online multiplayer in there, the budget either would have grown far bigger than they could handle or other parts of the game would have suffered. It's not worth it. And if 50 Eurors for 10 hours doesn't cut it for you, then just don't buy it since it obviously isn't the game for you. Go play your Call of Duties and all other multiplayer games, again, not every game needs it. |
I am fan of story mode over multiplayer anyway. I just feel that you may be defending a cause blindly here. I'm just saying that we should get online features for our money, and that game companies should invest more bloody money in making their games if they have to. Maybe that way they'll manage to sell something. I'm just confused as to why you aren't as demanding of game companies as I am. Don't you want the very best for your money? I certainly do.