Sega I use to like many Sega games. Now Since they left the console making I feel there efforts are mostly crap.





Who would you like to see enter / reenter the console race in the next gen? | |||
| Apple | 22 | 21.36% | |
| 14 | 13.59% | ||
| Sega | 52 | 50.49% | |
| Other? | 15 | 14.56% | |
| Total: | 103 | ||
Sega I use to like many Sega games. Now Since they left the console making I feel there efforts are mostly crap.





Would be interesting to see what Google could do with the absolutely rediculous sums of money they are sitting on (they have more Free Cash than ANY company in the world). Tho, Id rather see them continue on their lines of hardline internet over all the US.
Apple would be worse for hardware gaming than any of the 3 that are in it now. What I mean is, they would be to disruptive. If you think Greenburg, Trenton or Reggie are bad...just wait till Jobs brings out his console...iBlow.
SEGA does not have the monetary might to come in strong enough to compete. Of the three listed they are probably the LEAST likely to do so (tho Id MUCH rather have them than the others). I like where Sega is now, but I think they could make a POSITIVE impact in the console wars if one of the current three ducked out.
Two is not enough, 3 is just right and 4 would be a crowd.
Sega, give me Sonic Adventure 3 and I promise to buy at least 10 copies.
SEGA!!!
The Dreamcast is the greatest console ever created. It has features that even the 360 doesn't have (out of the box online play, a web-browser, Mouse and Keyboard support, cross-platform multiplayer).
I'll say Apple, and anybody who says they already are with the iPhone, I'll kick in the nuts.
Sega would just get its ass kicked more and lose even more money.
Google would be awesome! They could make a great console I think, but I doubt they ever would.
It would be amazing if a TV company like Samsung or Panasonic came up with a TV that has their new console built in! Like you slide the disk right into the TV and it plays. I know it would be expensive and probably flop hard but it would be a cool idea.
I don't want anyone to enter the console 'race'. In fact, I want someone to drop out. In my opinion, developers use to pay more attention to the actual games back when there was only two major consoles. And it was easier to be a quote 'console gamer' then because you only needed to focus on one or two consoles that would get half or more of the best games. Now in order to truly enjoy the console experience, you either have to buy all three or 'choose a side' and argue about how your decision is superior.
They say competition creates better diversity and better quality. But in many ways, its not doing that for the gaming industry. Its just forcing more companies to be bought up and the 'big three' to fight each other to the point of stupidity.
Sony and Microsoft, it's boring seeing Nintendo walk all over them without having to fight.
I want Apple to join and to fail. Every non-portable apple product failed, because you can't show it off. They can ask sony how an overpriced product works. (600USD!)
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
I'd much rather see it drop back down to 2. 2 is a good number.
The best type of split is that old genesis SNES split. You know where the older people went to the more hardcore Sega, the casual younger people went to the SNES which censored games like Mortal Kombat 2 so their parents wouldn't get upset. It was perfect.
Ditto for the late gen split between the N64 and the PS1 (once Saturn more or less died off).
Two is a good number of consoles, one casual and cheap (where Nintendo is best such as the Gamecube, N64, Wii. Uses old technology and revamps classic properties) and one adult and more expensive (where Sony is best with games like Heavy Rain, God of War, Gran Turismo etc).
I really have no idea why Microsoft is in it other then Microsoft wants to be in it and has money to burn. They have neither the cheap classic appeal of the Wii nor the cutting edge tech appeal of Sony. They are just kind of the turd in the punch bowl really that just creates needless competition without making anything better.
At least when it was Nintendo vs Sega vs Sony (where Sony and Sega both went after the adult market) Sega had classic quality games on the Saturn and Dreamcast to justify their position. I would argue that Sonic Adventure alone (when it was released, not by todays standards obviously) was better then anything I've seen from Microsoft over the entire life of the 360. Ditto for Panzar Dragoon.
PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me