That article is hilarious, mainly because you know how the extreme PS3 fans will be exploding with rage about it. To remove all the sarcasm and abuse I think it can be summarised with 7/10 isn't a bad score, stop whining about their opinion.

I saw this coming a mile away. He was just having too much fun with the fanboys after that 10.

And I thought he could've been a little more subtle to piss them off further, but whatever.

I guess the only way to really score a game that is the epitome of "It's so bad it's good" is to give it a 10/10. A lesser score (but in the good range) actually diminishes the badness of the game, and a "so bad it's good" game can't be given a low rating, because that besically contradicts the "it's good" part of the reviewer's opinion. If a game is the perfect representation of that phrase then it is the best at what it is and so a 10/10 is what it should get. Though I would strongly argue that an even better score would be an 11/10.

Of course this means there must be a new genre created for gaming so that people don't get the wrong impression with such a review: The "crap games that are a lot of fun if you play them with the right attitude" genre. This genre accepts all forms and styles of gameplay of course.

Giving this game a 10/10 also makes a mockery of the game reviewing media overall, which could also be seen as a good thing.

Overall Deadly Premonition could contribute much more to gaming this generation than many so-called iconic mainstream games.

I've never heard of Deadly Premonition.

Im so confused though... they gave deadly premonition a 10/10, i guess I could find worse ways to spend 20 dollars, im buying this game.

I love this. That man is a genius.

this article is full of BS xD

No.

Giving DP a 2/10 is a mockery of gaming journalism. I don't agree with a 10/10 for DP, but its a lot closer to reality than 2/10.

And since you haven't played DP, I don't think your entitled to argue its merits or detractors very well. It is a fantastic title. Is it perfect? No, it has obvious flaws, but for what it is: a quirky survival horror game from the PS2 era at a PS2 game price. The game has great qualities to it in a way that few other survival horror games have. In any other survival horror game, you would have most likely beaten it by the time that you get halfway through DP.

DP is a game that comes out once in a generation. You never expect it to be anything more than a laughable trash title for $20, but winds up being incredibly competent, and overall great. My fiancee is 13hrs into the game, and we still have no idea who the killer is.

Of course, you may not get the quirkiness of the title. Having litterally psycotic people in a game makes for a lot of fun. The game, 13hrs in, is building a steady amount of tension, and it is fantastic.

Comparing the two games is a disservice to both. I think Jim Sterling did this to give more press to a title (Deadly Premontion) that has been slagged by IGN simply because it is low budget and doesn't have a gizillion polygons on each head.

Games are art, and Deadly Premontion is the very essence of art. It is not a template game cut from the same mould as others. It is different in so many ways. It is inspiring to see this is happening in the industry. As a gamer I feel dropping $20 for this game is well worth the while.

This article is brilliant. He goes a little overboard but to see people take this writing seriously is pure comedic gold. Sarcasm is lost on the stupid, I guess.