By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - How people lead with teens and sex in yout cuntry?

RCTjunkie said:
TheRealMafoo said:
axumblade said:
Males that are caught masturbating in my country have whichever hand they were using cut off.

Good thing he is lying... I would be typing this with my nose otherwise.

 

OT: Almost everyone has sex at my school. But condoms are smiled, not frowned upon. My GF and I decided to wait until marriage against Esmoriet's will.


Correction - you decided to wait while we were agreeing on that...



The Doctor will see you now  Promoting Lesbianism -->

                              

Around the Network

this thread is full of win.



Esmoreit said:
dsister44 said:
Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

You know this from experience?


Never been married, luckily but damn can I imagine. You're preppng up for that special night for the past couple of months/years. Then that night you take off her dress, flopp on her body for 2 minutes and you're done. Bang, wedding night, time to sleep it off.

NÖÖÖÖ gimme my experience beforehand.

If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it.

In short, I strongly disagree.

Experience = not important at all.

Abstinence-based love > sexual experience.



Check out my band, (the) Fracture Suit!!

http://www.myspace.com/fracturesuit

 

 

 

Have you been enslaved?

bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
dsister44 said:
Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

You know this from experience?


Never been married, luckily but damn can I imagine. You're preppng up for that special night for the past couple of months/years. Then that night you take off her dress, flopp on her body for 2 minutes and you're done. Bang, wedding night, time to sleep it off.

NÖÖÖÖ gimme my experience beforehand.

If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it.

In short, I strongly disagree.

Experience = not important at all.

Abstinence-based love > sexual experience.

That's why couples believing in abstinence marry so incredibly young. Because of love and nót because they look forward to a wedding night. Believe me, aside from accidental pregnancies the only surefire way a swift wedding is coming is due to abstinence and hormones.

Not necessarily bad unless you count the fact that couples might marry to early while they don't even know if they are right for eachother in the long run. I've seen that happening way too often and yes, that is experience...



The Doctor will see you now  Promoting Lesbianism -->

                              

Esmoreit said:
bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
dsister44 said:
Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

You know this from experience?


Never been married, luckily but damn can I imagine. You're preppng up for that special night for the past couple of months/years. Then that night you take off her dress, flopp on her body for 2 minutes and you're done. Bang, wedding night, time to sleep it off.

NÖÖÖÖ gimme my experience beforehand.

If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it.

In short, I strongly disagree.

Experience = not important at all.

Abstinence-based love > sexual experience.

That's why couples believing in abstinence marry so incredibly young. Because of love and nót because they look forward to a wedding night. Believe me, aside from accidental pregnancies the only surefire way a swift wedding is coming is due to abstinence and hormones.

Not necessarily bad unless you count the fact that couples might marry to early while they don't even know if they are right for eachother in the long run. I've seen that happening way too often and yes, that is experience...

If you're married, then you are with the right person. That's what "till death do us part" means. You're married now, so you make it work. People who get divorced in situations that do not involve infidelity or abuse (or any other such extremes) are often simply too lazy or selfish to make it work. (Most often, it's selfishness. It kills marriages faster than anything else.) And that's just inexcusable, especially if you have kids.



Check out my band, (the) Fracture Suit!!

http://www.myspace.com/fracturesuit

 

 

 

Have you been enslaved?

Around the Network
invetedlotus123 said:

Well, here in Brazil it's pretty strange. I'm seventeen and I'm virgin, people see me like an abnomination. My father says that i'm wasting my teens, that sex in my age is just fun.

 

How does it work in your country?

This is the bit that seems unusual.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
dsister44 said:
Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

You know this from experience?


Never been married, luckily but damn can I imagine. You're preppng up for that special night for the past couple of months/years. Then that night you take off her dress, flopp on her body for 2 minutes and you're done. Bang, wedding night, time to sleep it off.

NÖÖÖÖ gimme my experience beforehand.

If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it.

In short, I strongly disagree.

Experience = not important at all.

Abstinence-based love > sexual experience.

That's why couples believing in abstinence marry so incredibly young. Because of love and nót because they look forward to a wedding night. Believe me, aside from accidental pregnancies the only surefire way a swift wedding is coming is due to abstinence and hormones.

Not necessarily bad unless you count the fact that couples might marry to early while they don't even know if they are right for eachother in the long run. I've seen that happening way too often and yes, that is experience...

If you're married, then you are with the right person. That's what "till death do us part" means. You're married now, so you make it work. People who get divorced in situations that do not involve infidelity or abuse (or any other such extremes) are often simply too lazy or selfish to make it work. (Most often, it's selfishness. It kills marriages faster than anything else.) And that's just inexcusable, especially if you have kids.

It's not that easy man, life is too complicated. Let's say after a couple has sex, and the man/woman wants more than the other one, then you have someone with a much higher sex drive than the other. This has caused MANY MANY MANY relationships to collapse. We are sexual beings there is no avoiding that.



PSN ID: KingFate_

you lead teens into your cunt? pedo! lol j/k

OT: you should do things when youre ready, dont do it "because its cool", chances are it wont end well, ideally with someone you care about too, thats my thoughts anyway.



KingFate said:
bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
bimmylee said:
Esmoreit said:
dsister44 said:
Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

You know this from experience?


Never been married, luckily but damn can I imagine. You're preppng up for that special night for the past couple of months/years. Then that night you take off her dress, flopp on her body for 2 minutes and you're done. Bang, wedding night, time to sleep it off.

NÖÖÖÖ gimme my experience beforehand.

If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it.

In short, I strongly disagree.

Experience = not important at all.

Abstinence-based love > sexual experience.

That's why couples believing in abstinence marry so incredibly young. Because of love and nót because they look forward to a wedding night. Believe me, aside from accidental pregnancies the only surefire way a swift wedding is coming is due to abstinence and hormones.

Not necessarily bad unless you count the fact that couples might marry to early while they don't even know if they are right for eachother in the long run. I've seen that happening way too often and yes, that is experience...

If you're married, then you are with the right person. That's what "till death do us part" means. You're married now, so you make it work. People who get divorced in situations that do not involve infidelity or abuse (or any other such extremes) are often simply too lazy or selfish to make it work. (Most often, it's selfishness. It kills marriages faster than anything else.) And that's just inexcusable, especially if you have kids.

It's not that easy man, life is too complicated. Let's say after a couple has sex, and the man/woman wants more than the other one, then you have someone with a much higher sex drive than the other. This has caused MANY MANY MANY relationships to collapse. We are sexual beings there is no avoiding that.

Oh, I'm not saying we aren't sexual beings. I totally agree with you on that. But in your proposed hypothetical situation, whichever person is denying their spouse the much-needed sexual release is the one being selfish. If your spouse wants sex, but you may not be in the mood, you make a sacrifice and give them sex anyway. It's still a matter of how willing you are to be selfless in the marriage relationship. Differing sex drives are ultimately irrelevant.

Marriage is not something that you should just "try out" to see if that person is who you will be spending the rest of your life with. That's what dating is for. Once you get married, you've made the choice. Otherwise, marriage is pointless.



Check out my band, (the) Fracture Suit!!

http://www.myspace.com/fracturesuit

 

 

 

Have you been enslaved?

Esmoreit said:
Oh man, that's roughly on the scale of "No More Herpes".

On topic. Go have sex but make it special. Believe me, saving for your weddingnight only to find out that you suck at it, isn't helping the mood.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is coming from someone that is not:

  • Married
  • Assumes that waiting till marriage means you'll automatically suck at it

:-\

 

Can't some people show restraint anymore? Just because you wait for something doesn't mean it'll be less worthwhile.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.