bimmylee said:
If a couple has been saving themselves for marriage, then sex has never been a factor in their relationship prior to getting married. This means that they've wanted to be together regardless of how good in bed the other one may/may not be. If their love for each other before marriage was never based on sexual performance in the first place, then whatever happens on the wedding night will not change that. Also, if you don't know from experience, then you couldn't possibly comprehend the magnitude of years-worth of sexual energy being released at once. Sounds like a good time to me. I personally look forward to it. In short, I strongly disagree. Experience = not important at all. Abstinence-based love > sexual experience. |
That's why couples believing in abstinence marry so incredibly young. Because of love and nót because they look forward to a wedding night. Believe me, aside from accidental pregnancies the only surefire way a swift wedding is coming is due to abstinence and hormones.
Not necessarily bad unless you count the fact that couples might marry to early while they don't even know if they are right for eachother in the long run. I've seen that happening way too often and yes, that is experience...
The Doctor will see you now
Promoting Lesbianism --> 








