There is no such thing as too much Fire Emblem. I wouldn't complain about more turn based Paper Mario but no more SPM for me.

Screw them ALL! I want Advance Wars Wii!

Yeah, I didn't bother leveling up Haar much. I didn't use any of the units with vulnerabilities (ie pegasus knights or wyrvern riders) if I could avoid it, they were just too vulnerable. I also didn't use mages much actually. My team consisted of lots of laguz, some cavalry, swordsmen, and one axe wielder so that I could use hammers

Ilyana or Vivian...


I cannot choose!

I want a new Paper Mario.

I'd rather fry bacon in the nude than play a Fire Emblem game.

Make a Paper Luigi game Ninty!!!

I want to see the old FE games remade and released in America.

when i saw this thread was bumped, the thought of a new Paper Mario momentarily came to mind :(

i thought somebody, somewhere just posted some kind of news about a possible sequel to one of these franchises...

i miss those games SOOOOO much :'(

Mr Khan, seriously, a "proper Fire Emblem game" on the Wii that uses the pointer? How is Radiant Dawn not a proper Fire Emblem game and how would Fire Emblem benefit from the pointer? I remember when it came out and some people did wonder why they decided not to use it. When I played it I was so thankful that they didn't bow to such gimmicky thinking and made the right decision by not tacking on inappropriate Wii control.

Scrolling through items, options, movement squares, etc. is so much easier, more comfortable, more relaxing and more intuitive with the D-pad than having to constantly point at everything. I cannot believe that you played Radiant Dawn and thought at any point that the D-pad control was anything other than perfect. Subtle, intricate nuances of fingers and thumbs are quicker, easier, more intuitive and more effective than big, heavy, clunky arm movements. Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn has perfect controls. The controls of a "proper" Fire Emblem game surely?