By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS3 performing better than PS1?!

This article just flashed Crazyman's argument into my mind again...From what I can tell it's the same thing....



Former something....

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
Grimes said:
This is like saying the Phantom Menace is more successful than A New Hope.

I'm just curious, have you ever said a nice thing about Sony?

No...

OT:

BOOM SHAKKA LAKKA!!! 



4 ≈ One

CGI-Quality said:
Grimes said:
This is like saying the Phantom Menace is more successful than A New Hope.

I'm just curious, have you ever said a nice thing about Sony?

I just compared the PS1 to A New Hope. Sony did a fantastic job in building the PS1 from scratch. I'm sorry you can't see that.



Anyone can guess. It takes no effort to throw out lots of predictions and have some of them be correct. You are not and wiser or better for having your guesses be right. Even a blind man can hit the bullseye.

CGI-Quality said:
Carl2291 said:
To all the people who said i was wrong.

I fart in your general direction.

Eww.....

Still, this should silence some of the doubters! CGI-Quality & Carl ftw!

You need to go rent 'Monty Python and the Holy Grail' and educate yourself. You could even get it for PSP, if you had a PSP.

I blow my nose at you, you empty-headed, animal food trough wiper. Your Mother was a hamster and your father smelt of Elderberries! (all must be said in a heavily fake French accent)

Now go away and watch the movie or I will taunt you a second time.

@ Carl: I need to quote you in my sig, for perfect use of a Pythonism.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

PS3 is a "failure" because it is getting dominated by the Wii in sales and profit and isn't selling as well as the PS2.

The PS3 isn't a failure because it only has 33m units sold in 3 3/4 fiscal years, its because it isn't in 1st place.



Around the Network

Ps3 never been a complete failure not even when it launched for $600. The thing is that Sony really went overboard with PS3, they should just had made a console with similar specs to Xbox 360 and slapped on a Blu-ray drive on there and they would have won this generation hands down (over M$ anyway).

But noooo, they have to make a console with a retarded architecture, 10 year old controller without rumble, worse launch games than PS1, more expensive than the 3DO and the list goes on and on. If it where any other company than Sony PS3 would have been dead long ago.



wow that's surprising...i guess that can put things into perspective

however, the market is bigger now so I guess we'll have to wait and see how that factor will play into it



I started making videos for youtube; check them out.

Contra (No Deaths): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_OdnbGgupM

Super C (No Deaths): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHoJrHWATgU

Mike Tyson's Punch-Out!! (Mike Tyson TKO): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4L7oDV79aw

Systems owned: Atari 2600, NES(3), Top loader NES, Yobo NES, SNES, Sega Genesis, Sega Gamegear, Sega Nomad, Sega Saturn, Nintendo 64, Gamecube, Playstation 2, Wii, PS3 (slim 120 GB), Wii U

You should congratulate me. I destroyed the vile red falcon and saved the universe. I consider myself a hero.

mundus6 said:
Ps3 never been a complete failure not even when it launched for $600. The thing is that Sony really went overboard with PS3, they should just had made a console with similar specs to Xbox 360 and slapped on a Blu-ray drive on there and they would have won this generation hands down (over M$ anyway).

Although a lower specced PS3 would probably have been positive with regard to short term sales, I think it would have been bad regarding console sales in general. It would probably have eaten more into XBox 360 sales and to a lesser extend Wii sales and have resulted in a more juvenile userbase than is currently the case.

But I think from a grand perspective the current specs helps widen the console market as well as the console's long term potential (the 10+ year plan Sony talked about way before the PS3's release). Certainly also scientists and militaries are certainly more happy with the current specifications. From Sony's perspective not only short term sales are of importance, but also what the console provides to help advance the consumer electronics market.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

well done CGI..i was about to deliver the same article..u did post it!! Cheers!!



MikeB said:
mundus6 said:
Ps3 never been a complete failure not even when it launched for $600. The thing is that Sony really went overboard with PS3, they should just had made a console with similar specs to Xbox 360 and slapped on a Blu-ray drive on there and they would have won this generation hands down (over M$ anyway).

Although a lower specced PS3 would probably have been positive with regard to short term sales, I think it would have been bad regarding console sales in general. It would probably have eaten more into XBox 360 sales and to a lesser extend Wii sales and have resulted in a more juvenile userbase than is currently the case.

But I think from a grand perspective the current specs helps widen the console market as well as the console's long term potential (the 10+ year plan Sony talked about way before the PS3's release). Certainly also scientists and militaries are certainly more happy with the current specifications. From Sony's perspective not only short term sales are of importance, but also what the console provides to help advance the consumer electronics market.

Lower specs means a more juvenile userbase?

Than the ps1 and ps2 userbase were run by juveniles going by your theory.....



N64 is the ONLY console of the fifth generation!!!