whatever said:
I guess you failed at math. At metacritic, the average is 83, at gamerankings that average is 81.4. So IGNs score of 77 is closer to the average than any score 90 or above. The reviews that look ridiculous are the ones that gave it 100%. I wonder how much Ubisoft paid those sites. |
Again you cant say that, you havent played it.
If you knowtice i was complaining about the UK IGN score of 6.6, and they gave combat a 4.0.
Heck even IGN is low, IN MY OPINION. You havent PLAYED IT, so stop feeding me that IGN is almight with their score, no other sites gave it high scores, which prove that some people liked it others dont, and im voiceing that IGN hit it way to hard and it deserves more.
With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B
Proud supporter of all 3 console companys
Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp
Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.
Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.







