By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
whatever said:
Lost tears of Kain said:
 

Then that means metacritic has more reviews=makes it more accurate.

I can voice my opinion, dont tell me to get over it.

Again do the math, if you add the 80s and 90s, you clearly have more then the 60s and 70s, making IGNs rating below everyones else (why theres the average). Again do some math, and figure out what we are argueing about.


I guess you failed at math.  At metacritic, the average is 83, at gamerankings that average is 81.4.  So IGNs score of 77 is closer to the average than any score 90 or above.

The reviews that look ridiculous are the ones that gave it 100%.  I wonder how much Ubisoft paid those sites. 


Again you cant say that, you havent played it.

If you knowtice i was complaining about the UK IGN score of 6.6, and they gave combat a 4.0.

Heck even IGN is low, IN MY OPINION. You havent PLAYED IT, so stop feeding me that IGN is almight with their score, no other sites gave it high scores, which prove that some people liked it others dont, and im voiceing that IGN hit it way to  hard and it deserves more.



                 With regard to Call of Duty 4 having an ultra short single player campaign, I guess it may well have been due to the size limitations of DVD on the XBox 360, one of various limitations multi-platform game designers will have to take into consideration-Mike B   

Proud supporter of all 3 console companys

Proud owner of 360wii and DS/psp              

Game trailers-Halo 3 only dissapointed the people who wanted to be dissapointed.

Bet with Harvey Birdman that Lost Odyssey will sell more then Blue dragon did.