Here are those two pics. Found them in neogaf. Check these out.
Source: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=690685
Here are those two pics. Found them in neogaf. Check these out.
Source: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=690685
Looks the same
after someone gave me glasses with poop on them..
Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
It looks more like COD
Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!
Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st
For a blurry picture the alias is too evident. And tracking lost? Kinect? no.....
It doesn't really look bad, considering the lighting conditions the 1024x768 (phone)camera had to deal with.
Plus, alphas/betas do not necessarily represent the graphics of the full game, and Battlefield campaigns look much better than their corresponding multiplayer (at least on consoles).
kowenicki said:
|
Alright.. I'll compare it with a shots from a crappy youtube gameplay video...
Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
is that next gen? i am glad i am conservative on the graphics side. Show me the gameplay to make a proper conclusion. If the gameplay is outstanding as to balance the graphics capability of the console, then NEXT GEN IS HERE.
I'm maxing out the BF4 beta at 60fps on PC and doesn't look too great. Maybe I'm just going blind, maybe it's the beta. Who knows.
Panama said: I'm maxing out the BF4 beta at 60fps on PC and doesn't look too great. Maybe I'm just going blind, maybe it's the beta. Who knows. |
It's the beta http://mp1st.com/2013/10/01/dice-tech-director-battlefield-4-graphics-release-will-better-andor-faster/
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.