By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - It's time for Nintendo to go 3rd party. Who gets what?

Pyro as Bill on 06 March 2011

Would it be stupid for Nintendo to put a Mario Kart or NSMB demo or old version on XBL/PSN?



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Around the Network
Conegamer on 06 March 2011
Pyro as Bill said:

Would it be stupid for Nintendo to put a Mario Kart or NSMB demo or old version on XBL/PSN?

Yes.

Read the above reasons from me and others



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Pyro as Bill on 06 March 2011
Conegamer said:
Pyro as Bill said:

Would it be stupid for Nintendo to put a Mario Kart or NSMB demo or old version on XBL/PSN?

Yes.

Read the above reasons from me and others


But Nintendo have given up Mario and Zelda in the past. It's those games that I want to see exclusively on PS3 in Bluray.



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

TomaTito on 06 March 2011
Conegamer said:
Pyro as Bill said:

Would it be stupid for Nintendo to put a Mario Kart or NSMB demo or old version on XBL/PSN?

Yes.

Read the above reasons from me and others

Not really, if you think about it. We have been told during this generation that third parties can't compete against Nintendo games. By invading the competitors game market, it would implode the third party sales on said markets taking them all due its oustanding quality.

Nintendo doesn't do it because it would destroy the gaming industry. Bless 'em.



@Twitter | Switch | Steam

You say tomato, I say tomato 

"¡Viva la Ñ!"
Conegamer on 06 March 2011
TomaTito said:
Conegamer said:
Pyro as Bill said:

Would it be stupid for Nintendo to put a Mario Kart or NSMB demo or old version on XBL/PSN?

Yes.

Read the above reasons from me and others

Not really, if you think about it. We have been told during this generation that third parties can't compete against Nintendo games. By invading the competitors game market, it would implode the third party sales on said markets taking them all due its oustanding quality.

Nintendo doesn't do it because it would destroy the gaming industry. Bless 'em.

I think they don't do it because hardware is worth more than software



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network
Metallicube on 06 March 2011

HAHA keep dreamin' buddy! Maybe someday it'll come true!

Honestly, if you want Nintendo's games so much, just buy a freakin Wii at $200. You get two free games and access to loads of fun Nintendo games. It's not a bad deal at all :P



Metallicube on 06 March 2011
Pyro as Bill said:

Just for the record, I never said Nintendo has to solely go 3rd party.

They can still make consoles and first party games if they want, I just think they should let other consoles have some killer software too.


Sure, and Sony should give Nintendo their Jak series, since it is more like a Nintendo franchise. Also, 360 should give Wii its Halo series. Flawless logic :P



foxtail on 07 March 2011

"The unworthy must be removed from existence." - Akuma

"if it succeeds, we rise to the heavens, if it fails, we sink into hell." - Yamauchi

"Nintendo doesn't make hardware that doesn't have a clear and well-defined purpose, and so its hardware design teams are seeking to infuse their next product with that kind of purpose" - Iwata



bannedagain on 07 March 2011

WOW this thread is just WOW! NO, NO and no. Then he splits up the games and does so in favor of his preferable system. NINTENDO HAS SLAMMED THE OTHER SYSTEMS AND SHOULD NOT SPLIT. They are making more money, made less price drops, got a back log of games like no other. 

Yet this guy out of his hate for nintendo decides that hey nintendo has had a few months of lower sales. Hey lets make a nintedo is doomed thread. What a good idea. Yea they should split because for a few months sales are slumping.

 

Let me ask you this smart idea guy, HOW MANY UNITS HAS NINTENDO MOVED?  Get off it, you are purely biased as sh=t and will stop at nothing to slam nintendo. WHat a joke.



bannedagain on 07 March 2011
Dr.Grass said:
IxisNaugus said:

Very well written and well analysed post Pyro as Bill. But if I may balance out your OP, I'd like to give my two cents on the future of some of the other lesser Nintendo franchises, and where they should go.

I believe Star Fox should head to the X360. that system has been getting its share of shmup's and while I am aware that Star Fox is not entirely comparable to the likes of Deathsmiles and Mushihemesama, I believe the microsoft camp may appreciate what the franchise has to offer. Then again, I'm not quite sure how receptive X360 owners are of furries.

I believe Kirby also has a future on the X360. The console has a distinct lack of platformers with traditional values while the PS3 gets Littlebigplanet and Mario, and Kirby can build a fanbase there. There may even be a bit of rivalry between the PS3 Mario fans and the X360 Kirby boys. Much like the good old Halo vs Killzone arguments.

F-Zero should also head to the X360 to combat the Wipeout games on the Playstation platforms. I feel the franchise will also benefit not only the HD visuals, but also the strong online support the console has to offer. 30 player online races anyone?

I think it's only fair that Mario sports titles go multiplatform. Same goes for Super Smash Bros.

Would you say this is fair?

Bahaha. You actually agree?

I'll have a laugh too. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH you agree. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!