The RolStoppable Appreciation Thread

[KungKras]

angrypoolman said:

KungKras said:

Someone can in practice be against human rights. Nobody should be though, don't you agree?

I think the whole concept of calling whatever your pet issue is "human rights" is dumb. When you say something this vague, I have no idea what you even mean, so i dont take it seriously.

You're the one being vague right now. 

I brought up being against human rights as an example of a red line that would make something cross over from being "just politics" for me into something that crosses a red line. 
I used that as an example to ask the guy if he has similar red lines, since Malstrom talking about introducing more laws that restrict women was "just politics" to him. To get get more of a feel for what he considers "just politics" vs what he considers existential. 

What part of this was vague to you? 
Also, anything is vague if you never read it https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights jeez.

Anyway, this is getting off topic. Perhaps I'll create a new thread for this when I have free time.  

My original point was, Malstrom: bad and facist.
RolStoppable: Good.

There, now we're back to the Rol appreciation.