Mnementh said:
Oh no, you alone have the power to decide what is big based on your personal tastes. And even though Starfox crashed and burned every time since the N64: Star Fox Zero, Star Fox 64 3D. But no, it must be a big because angrypoolman likes it. And everyone who cannot see it's greatness must be purposely obtuse. As the teenager I am according to you, in the 90s I played Baldur's 1+2. This franchise was abandoned for more than 2 decades, but Baldur's Gate 3 proved it is still a relevant franchise today. So old franchises *can* still be relevant. Starfox got so many chances by Nintendo over the years, but clearly nobody gives a shit anymore. Nintendo is better off torching this franchises and focusing their effort on more relevant - and quite frankly better - franchises. That they keep wasting their developer time on that is impossible to understand. |
those star fox games crashed and burned because they were garbage.
i know, i know. who am i to say theyre garbage, another instance of me saying what i like is superior and what everyone else likes doesnt matter blah blah blah
well guess what, theyre garbage. baldurs gate 3 wasnt garbage which is why it was able to re establish relevance again. maybe they should make a star fox that isnt garbage, which is what this remake could have been.
and yes you must be a teenager because you must not remember ten years ago when star fox zero was in development. people were absolutely hyped for that game because it looked like it was going to be a return to form. but no, they decided to fuck with it and now it is generally regarded as more garbage. they havent given star fox a fair shot, they always are doing some bullshit with it, which is why the franchise sucks now. what i am saying is so obvious to anyone who has been around and paid attention just a little bit.
Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0








