Should Console Developers Prioritize Exclusivity? Or Bring To PC?

[Chrkeller]

The_Yoda said:

Chrkeller said:

Fair, $50 a year and not $80.  I honestly don't know the details, with a PC I just emulate and save the money.  PC emulation is better anyway, IMO.  Majora and Banjo can be played at 120 fps, 4k with HD textures.  Ocarina is coming soon.  The Nintendo subscription, IMO, is grossly overpriced.  

Compared to Sony the Nintendo subscription is not overpriced let alone grossly overpriced.  For $35 a year (about $4.50 per person per year) myself and 7 other people can play online and get access to around 150 games.  For 80 a year you and 7 other people get access to 300 games and online play ($10 per person per year).  I get that is not a great value if you are just pirating games but then again nothing else would be.

I am referencing more the classic games being behind a paywall.  The issues I have are multiple.  The first being I already bought them on the Wii, paid for an upgrade on the Wii-U...  they don't port over to the S1 nor S2, and are stuck behind a paywall.  And there are too many great games missing.  Add in limited upgrades and QoL for their classic games.  I think it is grossly overpriced.  I only went emulation because of how terrible of a deal it is.  

edit

but back on topic, I do think Sony should support PC.  I get the argument that if their games are Playstation only, then people will buy and pay for their subscriptions.  I am not entirely convinced that is accurate.  I don't think PC gamers do much console gaming, nor do I think console gamers will jump ship to PC.  The overlap of those demographics I think is small.  Though that is speculation and I could be wrong.  

Last edited by Chrkeller - 4 hours ago