Should Console Developers Prioritize Exclusivity? Or Bring To PC?

[Chrkeller]

firebush03 said:

Chrkeller said:

I get it, and I wasn't trying to add confusion.  But I do think there is a difference between Day 1 and Day 730.  Honestly a pretty big difference, if not massive.  It felt worth clarifying my point on what Sony/MS should do.  Even Nintendo, if I am honest.  

Either way, you might be in the same boat, for me consoles have lost value.  

Series X: $650

ps5: $650

PSN: 6 years x $80 @ $480

Nintendo Online: 6 years x $80 @ $480

Total: $2,260....  which builds a heck of PC that will be ps6 like in power/ability, meaning I don't need to buy a $800 ps6..  which takes me to $3,000...  

All good. And I agree there is a major difference, especially for those who own a nice gaming PC. (Also, NSO is $20/year, no? Unless you want the N64 games, then that’s $50.)

Fair, $50 a year and not $80.  I honestly don't know the details, with a PC I just emulate and save the money.  PC emulation is better anyway, IMO.  Majora and Banjo can be played at 120 fps, 4k with HD textures.  Ocarina is coming soon.  The Nintendo subscription, IMO, is grossly overpriced.