Which do you feel is Nintendo's most revolutionary game, and why?

[Chrkeller]

curl-6 said:

Chrkeller said:

I completely agree.  Motion, at best, is niche.  To me revolutionary means game changing, not temp one hit wonder.

4 face buttons, analog, dual analog, shoulder buttons...  motion isnt remotely on the same plan.

I mean, it is really "niche" when it's a default feature in games selling 15, 20, 30 million?

And can be really calling it temporary when it's been 20 years now and it's still a thing?

Niche was too strong of a word.  I think Soundwave is right, secondary is the better word.  Motion isnt quite standard and it isnt primary, which for me means, not revolutionary.  But yes, I will concede niche is too strong.  Fair.

I have not used motion outside Galaxy HD in 10 years.  And I play a lot of Nintendo.  Secondary is a fair term.