By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave 9 hours ago
Edit Thread
Chrkeller said:
Soundwave said:

There's no point in speculating on that because it's entirely whatever Aonuma or who ever is heading the project feels. 

There's no rule whatsoever on what Nintendo can/can't do on that though, so much bullshit over things people think Nintendo are confined by when they're not. 

Nintendo will do whatever makes sense for them in the damn moment, doesn't matter what happened 5 years ago, 10 years ago, we've seen that like 50 times over the last 3 years with people argue stupid shit like Switch 2 can't be called "Switch 2" because "Nintendo wouldn't do that" (wrong). Nintendo does whatever suits them in the moment and that changes radically all the time. 

Lol, this entire thread is solely based on speculation, but we shouldn't speculate?  

And I swear you make up arguments.  Who said the Switch wouldn't be called 2?  Lol, calling it S2 makes all the sense in the world and should surprise nobody.  Especially after the whole Wii-U debacle.

Tons of people were saying the "Switch 2" leak had to be a fake because Nintendo doesn't follow Sony's numbered hardware naming schemes so Switch 2 couldn't possibly be the name. And also Nintendo doesn't launch systems with a Mario Kart so Mario Kart couldn't possibly be the launch title because they've never done it before. And it definitely wasn't going to cost $450-$500 (lol) because of past hardware pricing. Wrong, wrong, wrong. 

People waste so much energy on this silly shit. Nintendo gives no fucks about any of these so-called "rules", they'll break and make new rules all the time. They give zero fucks, it's all about today and tomorrow whatever their management (which isn't even the same management as 10 years ago) thinks is best. And that's it. 

Nintendo quite frankly does the exact 180 opposite of what many internet enthusiasts think alllllll the freaking time. 

Last edited by Soundwave - 9 hours ago