By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
Chrkeller said:

Sure, but it does demonstrate Nintendo was interested in other forms of media.  So, the whole "I can't believe Nintendo is doing movies" claim a bit silly, IMO.  There was a Ratchet movie, TLoU TV show, GoW is coming as well.  Resident Evil was a franchise of movies, etc. 

I expect a Zelda game.  Again, not sure how to get you to read to understand versus read to respond, I think it will be a faithful remake, not a complete reimaging.  I don't see Ocarina being BotW.  My claim ISN'T Ocarina won't be updated, I think it will stay closer to the original than some are suggestion.  

There's no point in speculating on that because it's entirely whatever Aonuma or who ever is heading the project feels. 

There's no rule whatsoever on what Nintendo can/can't do on that though, so much bullshit over things people think Nintendo are confined by when they're not. 

Nintendo will do whatever makes sense for them in the damn moment, doesn't matter what happened 5 years ago, 10 years ago, we've seen that like 50 times over the last 3 years with people argue stupid shit like Switch 2 can't be called "Switch 2" because "Nintendo wouldn't do that" (wrong). Nintendo does whatever suits them in the moment and that changes radically all the time. 

Lol, this entire thread is solely based on speculation, but we shouldn't speculate?  

And I swear you make up arguments.  Who said the Switch wouldn't be called 2?  Lol, calling it S2 makes all the sense in the world and should surprise nobody.  Especially after the whole Wii-U debacle.

Who said MK wasnt a reasonable launch title?  MK is a massive seller with wide appeal.  It makes perfect sense as a launch title.

Most everyone predicted $400 to $500...  lol, including me.

How many imaginary arguments have you "won?"



rtx 4090, 32 gb ram, i7-13700k

Switch 2