sc94597 said:
If Chess and Go are the precedent, this won't be the case. People still enjoy watching, playing, and competing in Chess and Go despite AI systems being superior to humans for a while now (almost 30 years in the case of Chess.) A lot of recreational art isn't digital, and really AI seems to be on path to replace art products (basically image generation as an occupation for content output that has another use) more than recreational art. |
You can also look into history at things like photography. Drawing was at some point used in the way photography became, for instance people made family portraits. With photograpohy the art changed and artists moved to more abstract drawing styles. There is value in being creative and people recognize this. I think though that you cannot expect as much payment, but more art as an hobby that you actually invest in. But that will never go out of use, because people need creative outlets, regardless if they are paid for them or not.
