Does it make it make financial sense for Nintendo to make more Switch hardware that can't Switch?

[Wman1996]

JRPGfan said:

Apparently there is a large consumer base of Nintendo fans that never use the Portable aspect....
they leave it, hooked up to the tv once they buy it, and basically never use it any other way.

So yes, I think that makes more sense than a portable only device.
If they can knock off like 50-100$ off the price... and offer a switch 2 that is only a base console they should.

I find the idea of a Switch 2 tv very appealing myself.

While it would be quite highly priced in North America for what it is (and maybe other regions) I still think there's room for a Switch TV. 

64 GB Storage and an ethernet port like Switch OLED and Switch 2 and a Pro Controller included instead of JoyCons (with a disclaimer on the box about compatibility). Without tariffs, it could be $120-$170. With them, it would probably be $150-$200. 

But again, Nintendo seems content to greatly scale down Switch production even more than we anticipated so a TV-only model will likely be saved for Switch 2. And it might be a Pro Version at a premium price point instead of savings for people who want the current Switch 2 specs without handheld capabilities.