By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
Chrkeller said:

Is the S2 able to render at lower resolutions via DLSS and put demand off the CPU?  

DLSS (non-FG) shouldn't save CPU resources. Internal resolution is mainly a GPU-bound task. Scaling by it saves the GPU. Besides, to get the game to run on the Rog Ally anywhere near an unstable 30fps the game is running at a 900p target with FSR Performance mode (and even then there are stutters down to 20fps.) That's internally 800 x 450. Doubt the Switch 2 version is running internally lower than that in docked mode. 

Realistically, I don't think the game is CPU bound (or rather it shouldn't be) on the Rog Ally (and similar handhelds.) It's just the Switch 2 being advantaged by 1. being a closed-platform with dedicated, fixed resources allocated to the OS and 2. bespoke settings optimization (like the more obvious pop-in) to mitigate any of the disadvantages the Switch 2 has. 

The Rog Ally should be running the game much better than it is, really, but PC ports can often turn out to be crap compared to closed-platform console ones, especially on lower-end hardware. 

That makes sense.  and seems spot on.  My 4090 is (making up numbers) is 8x a ps5...  but in reality, it isn't.  don't get me wrong, it out classes the ps5, but with an open system optimization is meh.



“Consoles are great… if you like paying extra for features PCs had in 2005.”