How Will be Switch 2 Performance Wise?

[Chrkeller]

HoloDust said:

Chrkeller said:

The irony being I'm right about the UK rules.  I have a UK drivers license.  The people telling me I'm wrong, which I'm not, do not.  Hell one of them hasn't even been to the UK and other has never driven a car.  The issue all stimmed, not that anybody will admit it, they thought I was making fun of their policy.  I wasn't.  I think it is safer.  

As far as fps, fair enough I should have picked my verbiage better.  The gap gets smaller, especially past 90 fps.  But 90 fps has an absolute tangible benefit, especially once you get used to it.

I'd be curious who actually took the time to demo the UFO Test.  I know HaloDust did.  The UFO test, for me, is very clear in demonstration of the benefit.

But to be fair, my verbiage wasn't as accurate as it should have been and has caused unnecessary back and forth.

Edit

I'm also sincerely curious if anybody here will change their position via prime 4 at 120 fps.

I have two 165Hz VRR monitors in house (both in kids' rooms), but honesty, only time I run them that high is when I occasionally play something online on their PCs. I tend to cap most games at 60Hz, but whenever I decide to play the game with mouse+kb (I hate gamepad aiming), I tend to cap it at 90 as a sweet spot between mouse feel and letting GPU make things look little bit nicer (one GPU is 3060, other is 9060XT, so they are limited in their capabilities - mine is 3080, but it's hooked to 4K/60Hz TV, so I don't play anything that calls for twitch reflexes on it).

I'm on a 120 hz oled TV.  I have tried a few times, 90 to 120 are identical for me.  I usually go 120 so my dips are still above 90.

Any thoughts on resolution? Maybe it is a lack of sensitivity on my side but 1440p and 4k are identical for me.