How Will be Switch 2 Performance Wise?

[Chrkeller]

Biggerboat1 said:

Chrkeller said:

So 60 to 90 is statistical significant....  huh, so there is benefit passed 60 fps...  I'd act surprised but that was my position.  

My position that 120 offers benefits over 60 fps still stands.  Has to stand because 75 offers benefits over 60 fps.  

That was not your position, your positions were:

'Diminishing returns past 120 fps. Sure. But objectively the average gamer does in fact benefit above 60 fps.'

and

'I'm astounded people think 60 fps to 120 fps is diminishing returns.'

It's not against the rules to change your position, in fact I think that's healthy when presented with new info. But claiming a W when in reality your initial position has been proved largely incorrect is a bit lame... 

Proven wrong how?  Diminishing returns, at least for me, implies negligible difference.  Like 1440p to 4k is diminishing returns because it looks virtually identical.  60 to 120 absolutely has impact.  It isn't negligible.  RE4 Remake is one of my favorite games.  I played it back to back on the PC vs ps5.  120 fps vs 60 fps, both with a gamepad.  At 60 fps my a accuracy was 72%, at 120 fps I hit around 80%...  I don't see that as negligible. 

"But objectively the average gamer does in fact benefit above 60 fps."

I don't see how the above statement has been proven largely wrong when there is a statistical difference....  and that was the first article I found with putting in little effort.  Other articles exist....  gamers do benefit from fps above 60 fps.