By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Chrkeller said:

Sacrifice to fps isn't worth it nor is it a fair comparison.  I get nobody wants to hear negative comments but being accurate is important for a tech analysis.  Take Cyber, the Series S has a 60 fps mode.  

Running games are significantly reduced fps, for me, isn't trading blows.  It is lagging behind.  Fps is easily the most important aspect for responsive and accurate controls.  We play games, so controls matter, thus fps is crucial.

Maybe you consider running a lot of games at half fps "trading blow," but I absolutely don't.  

For me "trading blows" implies it is hard to pick out which is the S2 version.  Picking out the 30 fps version takes 3 seconds.  

"Trading blows" in this context means each scores some wins over the other, which is the case here, as Series has more raw power, while Switch 2 has more RAM and superior upscaling tech.

It doesn't mean parity. 

If you say so.  I just don't agree.  Because that assumes having slightly better textures has the same impact as 2x fps....  and I don't agree all graphical parameters have equal weighting.  

And to me, trading blows means standing toe to toe.  Not getting a punch in on an occasion.



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED