By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
archbrix said:
Otter said:

For this reason I don't think it makes sense to compare 60fps to 120fps, but more to the point, diminishing returns means the jump from 60 > 120, is not as important as the jump from 30> 60... Just as people care less with with resolution jumps, the same applies with FPS. It's not exempt.

Yeah, I agree with this.  Most people can see (and feel) the difference between 30fps and 60fps - same way anyone can see the difference between 480p and 1440p.  Going from 60fps to 120fps or 1440p to 2160p is not nearly as noticeable.  It's not that the difference isn't there, but like you said, diminishing returns.

I'm astounded people think 60 fps to 120 fps is diminishing returns.  Makes me wonder how many people have really given it a try on a 120 hz monitor or TV.  Controls are so much more accurate and precise at 120 fps.  I can easily tell when I hit a rough spot on my fps drop below 90 fps.  

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but 120 fps isn't diminishing returns, it is literally game changing, because the controls are drastically improved because more fps means latency drops.  There is a reason competitive gamers play at high fps, it improves gameplay.  



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED