Hardstuck-Platinum said:
MS's intention was for the XBSS to be the competitor to the PS5 and have the XBSX as a luxury high end alternative. Exactly the same as Xbone - PS4 and Xbone X to PS4 Pro. Problem is, is that the XBSS backfired horribly and it never really qualified as a "next gen" in people's eyes. It just isn't very popular or in demand regardless of how cheap they made it. The only competitor they had left to PS5 was XBSX but that console was never intended to compete with PS5 and if they priced it the same as PS5 they'd be losing a boat load of money |
And the problem is that as far as I'm aware the only superior tech visible to the average person in a Series X is Quick Resume. But so does Series S, so that's pretty irrelevant in a Series X to PS5 power comparison.
There was absolutely no reason to make Series X a little more powerful than PS5 if there's really no advantages to the consumer. The pricing recently too has screwed Xbox Series especially if Sony doesn't raise the prices of PS5 consoles.
I truly wonder if a refresh launched midlife of Series that was in-between a Series S and X (and cheaper than X) would've helped.
Lifetime Sales Predictions
Switch: 161 million (was 73 million, then 96 million, then 113 million, then 125 million, then 144 million, then 151 million, then 156 million)
PS5: 122 million (was 105 million, then 115 million) Xbox Series X/S: 38 million (was 60 million, then 67 million, then 57 million. then 48 million. then 40 million)
Switch 2: 120 million (was 116 million)
PS4: 120 mil (was 100 then 130 million, then 122 million) Xbox One: 51 mil (was 50 then 55 mil)
3DS: 75.5 mil (was 73, then 77 million)
"Let go your earthly tether, enter the void, empty and become wind." - Guru Laghima







