There's just one thing that I keep thinking about, that cracks me up, and that's how Nin just can't help themselves after a hit product, and in this case:
Nin - Somehow, someway, doesn't screw the name up this time, leading everyone to believe for once they've got it all figured out.
Also Nin - Screws up the pricing royally, because they had to screw up something, because they always do, after a hit.
I actually think if Switch 2 had been priced at $399, then the backlash as to game pricing wouldn't have been near as bad. It would've obviously been the best move, to leave the hardware pricing at $449, and make the games $10 less. That would've only created minor controversy at most, and Nin could've had their cake and ate it too.
I don't really think Switch 2 is in trouble, I just think with the pricing strategy they have now, it's not going to come near the heights that Switch ends up reaching, but still can be a successful product.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
