LegitHyperbole said:
Otter said:
Sounds like you're talking about camera logic which is ultimately separate from frame rate. All games have slightly different setting which inform how quickly the camera updates/follows the player etc. For example a third person camera that just snaps to the players new location/orientation is likely to feel more choppier then one which slowly interpolates. But the latter may feel laggy if it moves too slowly. There's thumbstick sensitivty, deadzones and a lot of other stuff which can effect the feeling. framerate can make these more or less noticable.
Cyberpunk has pretty heavy input latency, which is a separate issue altogether which means that it takes a while for the game register player input because of all the world logic it first runs through, a lower FPS only makes it worse. I'd say its probably typical of modern games to have more input latency because of the complexity of the worlds and character animations
|
If it was then performance modes wouldn't solve it. Anyway, asides from that, there is differing levels of chopiness, Alan Wake 2 is clearly more smooth than Cybperpunk, The Witcher 3 or Dragons Dogma 2 in their quality modes and it's not me mistaking it while switching, it is a night and day differnce.
|
Framerate objectively changes latency so it would impact it.
There are differing levels of smoothness in 30fps experiences but again it goes back to the game logic, so it's just a case of discerning what aspect of the game (camera movement/pacing, post processing, latency) is making Alan a smoother experience for you because there is objectively no difference in frame rate if both games are hitting a solid 30.
