By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:
IkePoR said:

2 questions:

1. A late stage cancer patient, or a patient with a failing heart, develops Covid-19 and dies.  Is it not possible that any death slotted under "Covid-19" could have been caused by an underlying health condition?  

2. Why ought we believe the majority of mainstream media when it's proven disingenuous and often untruthful?

1. How many people who were late stage cancer patients and/or patients with falling hearts that also caught COVID and died? It's a pretty specific example but I imagine an autopsy would rule out many factors, but an extremely sick person contracting COVID and then dying, it is logical to assume even before looking into it that it was the COVID that took them out. Even a flu can kill someone with late stage cancer and/or a failing heart so COVID which is stronger than the flu could do the same no problem.

Just because they were going to die anyway doesn't mean it wasn't COVID that cut whatever last time they had left short. There is a reason why cancer patients are meant to be more cautious around sick people, their immune systems are compromised often due to treatment or the cancer itself. So I'm not sure why you struggle to believe COVID couldn't finish by your own description, extremely sick people, off.

2. This is not about believing mainstream media, it's about believing the scientists and healthcare professionals, I could also see with my own two eyes that the NHS was absolutely slammed during COVID but now things are a lot better, I didn't need the media to tell me shit, I could see it and I even experienced it as someone who has had regular check-ups at hospital for the past 18 years, struggling to get an appointment during COVID for my annual check-ups but now things are back to normal thanks to vaccines and herd immunity.

1. So assuming it is possible a failed heart patient could be deemed a Covid caused death, is it possible there are incentives toward setting such a precedent? During a time when there was mass hysteria and a public crisis, is it at all possible there would be some profiteering?  Do you believe it impossible that a highly profitable incentive to propagate the masses wouldn't be executed?  

2. Fair enough.  I ask questions to be more informed, not bicker, so, alright then.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"