By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zeldaring said:

Mar1217 said:

I'm sure they're glad to hear you say that, yet your empiric evidence doesn't matter when everything you said up to this point support no verifiable facts. If you could simply stop using the argument of authority(good fallacy btw) to justify circling around the same  flawed points you keep coming back to for the past ten of pages, it'd be great.

Aside from beyond3d. games do all the evidence how about developers calling it a 360 6 years later or one saying  iys weaker but ultimately wiiu had ton of ports and not one showed a meaningful advantage where the average person could even notice and performance on it's weak cpu couldn't handle open world games, they ran significantly worse. It's weaker then both 360/ps3 that's a fact.

And once again you keep circling back to the ports ... Despite the fact a port like the RDR one on Switch you're so dear of isn't exploiting the feature sets of the newest hardware, it is that simple. 

There's no problem in your opinion of liking the look of RDR better than what else is on the console but keep in mind that it is not an impressive technical feat for the hardware it is running on against the multitude of examples that were given that exactly does exploit the Switch more advanced processing features the previous generation could not achieve. This is the fact you keep turning down because you might be sad? that there's any who agrees with your flawed perspective.

Although you could make a thread about "the best looking games on Switch", you might actually stand a better chance there because it inherently wouldn't be about just graphics but more-so the overall visual look.



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909