Mar1217 said:
zeldaring said:
I'm sorry. i do care about there opinions cause they know there stuff, and they have developers post there, are you the only person on the internet that knows what they are talking about? I'll take there opinion over yours anyday. They don't act like their opinion is fact like yours. I also can judge with my own eyes. I don't need you forcing your opinion on me. Again even one of the mods here told you graphics are calcualtions something your eye will never see.
As for wiiu it's not based on anything that's ground breaking, developers were already familiar with the same gpu since it's in the same family as the 360, and for 40 plus ports not even one really showed a meaningful advantage gpu wise, I find that impossible but hey developers can't seem to know how to use it I'll just believe you cause you think botw which is not even as technically demanding as gtav proves something. The systems you mentioned in ports you can see massive advantages in color or resolution. Plus they were very exotic hardware for there time. Ps3 is also not really more powerful, it's on par.
|
I'm sure they're glad to hear you say that, yet your empiric evidence doesn't matter when everything you said up to this point support no verifiable facts. If you could simply stop using the argument of authority(good fallacy btw) to justify circling around the same flawed points you keep coming back to for the past ten of pages, it'd be great.
|
Aside from beyond3d. games do all the evidence how about developers calling it a 360 6 years later or one saying iys weaker but ultimately wiiu had ton of ports and not one showed a meaningful advantage where the average person could even notice and performance on it's weak cpu couldn't handle open world games, they ran significantly worse. It's weaker then both 360/ps3 that's a fact. I understand the gpu more modern but it lacked hp and lacked that cpu that help with graphics like the 360/ps3 that's what makes it overall weaker.
Last edited by zeldaring - on 02 August 2024
