trasharmdsister12 said:
"What does it matter if the final results are superb?", "Let's use a example crysis 3, if the 360 port of the game was 60fps/900p that would not be using Switch capabilities?" My last 2 posts have explained things in a way that you could come to the answers for these questions yourself. The first question could be answered by my first post. To summarize "It matters because the final result is not the be all and end all of what we're talking about here. If you want to talk about what looks best [to you] then you're welcome to create another thread about it." If you want more detail for what we're actually talking about here, go read my first response to you again. The second question was answered by my second post. But I'll add some more nuance to the answer to help guide you. The answer is, it depends on how they port it. Are they replacing the implementation of certain features to make better use the Switch's hardware capabilities? If so, yes the port would be making use of the Switch capabilities. If they just do a basic port and things that Switch hardware could be doing are still being done using old implementation, then no - it's not making the most of the Switch hardware because it's doing things less efficiently than it could be. So although it might be using 100% of the processing capabilities of the switch, it could actually be doing the same thing while using less than 100% of the hardware's capabilities if they changed how they're doing things. And then those extra processing cycles that are freed up can be used towards something else, leading to an even BETTER result. |
Ok explain to me why xenoblade 3 being mentioned? it even lacks features that were basic during the 360 era, like dynamic shadows and for a open world game that's one of the most important graphical feature, and it just looks like crap over all, and most likely when DF makes best looking thirdparty games they might mention RDR and crysis 3 then what. RDR looks a switch game while xenoblade 3 looks like a early ps3 game.
Switch's advanced graphical features could come at cost, like lower resolution, less stable framerate so there are tade offs. again BOTW is on wiiu its not using switch's advanced feature set , so does that not count as well? how about mario rpg which looks like a small indi game. What about mario wonder, it's not using those advanced graphical features but still mentioned why aren't you not questioning why DF mentioned it. like i said it's all bout someone not accepting being wrong,
