By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soundwave said:
Chrkeller said:

Probably because nobody in a ps5 thread would be ridiculous enough to claim the ps5 is the same hardware class as the 4090.

And nobody is saying people shouldn't enjoy switch games.  

The only dispute is if S2 is the same class as the ps5....  the answer is, no.  

Nobody goes into PS5 threads to tout the 4090's superiority because they have a life. 

It's only done for one console and one console only and no one has claimed literally 100% equivalent performance ever between Switch 2 and next-gen consoles. Everyone knows there is a trade off and there is an upside for that trade off too, the upside being you get a fully portable experience on top of a home experience. 

How many PS5 threads have someone coming into them and stating for no real particular reason that they own a 4090 and cannot stand to play at game below 120 fps? 

No one really behaves like in those cases. Why? Because they don't feel the need to gate keep. 

No idea.  Because when I was a ps5 owner and people said PC was a generational leap above, I agreed with them.  It isn't that hard to accept the S2 will be a huge upgrade over the Switch, but well short of the ps5.  

I'm looking forward to Nintendo software on a 2050.

This whole debate initiated when some people started the ps5 comparison and continue to do so.  It is a poor comparison.  The ps5 will have roughly 2x more ram and 4x more memory bandwidth.  A ps4 and ps4 pro is a good benchmark.  

For the record Nintendo is my favorite developer and I've owned every home console they have ever released.  S2 will be no different.  I'm happy to switch the discussion software.  

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 13 February 2024