By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shtinamin_ said:
sundin13 said:

So your defense is that you are only partially blaming the LGBT community? If you argue that a move away from "a common family" with "a man and a woman" will lead to the destruction of the USA, how is that not at least in part saying that the parts of the LGBT community who don't fit that definition are partially to blame for this destruction?

And please explain what exactly you mean when you talk about "pride from political leaders".

Same-sex attraction is a sensitive issue that requires kindness, compassion and understanding. And demands of people who don't to show love to them. The experience of same-sex attraction is a complex reality for many people.

I said "A common family" as an example, there are other kinds of family.

The U.S. has declared same-sex marriage legal and everyone may do as they please, just be aware of the those family members in the LGBTQIA2+ community also have the responsibility to teach their children (adopted, reared, etc.) positive values, and other family responsibilities as I have listed in my post above yours (provided below).

  • "Lack of family responsibilities (Equal partnership, sexual commitment to the partner, two parent household, divorcing, parents not protecting their families nor providing the necessities of life nor nurturing children, abandonment, domestic and sexual violence, cohabitation, etc.)
  • Lack of teaching values to the children (forgiveness, respect, love, compassion, work, wholesome recreational activities, faith, hope, charity, virtue, knowledge, patience, humility, diligence, obedience, honesty, trust, how to overcome addiction, how to be law-abiding citizens, etc.)"

In regards to me saying "Pride from Political Leaders", I was referring to LukerJ's post about housing crisis, poor public services, stagnant wages, and falling standards of living. Most of (if not all) those problems arise from political leaders focusing on themselves, money, fame, land, power, etc

Okay, honestly pretty reasonable answer. I think in the future you should watch out for using certain language if you don't mean what has been coded into it, but I don't have a ton to criticize about this. Maybe we'd be able to get into some differences if you laid out what policies you support and who you think best represents what you are looking for, but in the abstract, yeah, this is fine?