Rank the Presidents of Nintendo

[Wman1996]

curl-6 said:

The key to Furukawa's legacy could be consistency; for all the great things both Yamauchi and Iwata achieved, neither were able to maintain a consistent level of performance, with Nintendo under their stewardship varying from thriving to struggling.

There's a place for a steady, competent leader to bring some much needed long term stability.

Yes.

Kimishima (while considered an official President) could be considered a de facto interim President given he was only in the role for about 2.75 years (33 months). He was a pretty stable leader because the writing was on the wall for the Wii U at that point and Switch had already been greenlit. 3DS continued to be profitable through his time as well. 

Kimishima has very few, if any, failures that come to mind. 

If Switch 2 is a success (very likely). Furukawa will be a contender for the best. It makes me wonder if he'll retire in his late 50s to early 60s so he can go out on a very high note.