Machiavellian said:
On this I disagree. MS was coming into the Xbox one era with a lot of good will even with the RROD from the 360 era. I remember a lot of people was very hyped for their showing of the new console. After that conference with Don, everything spiraled all out of control from bad to worse. The focus on the system, the cost of the system with Kinect, The power of the system compared to PS4. When games started to hit and the games had clear very obvious advantages over the Xbox one with the PS4 being 100 dollar cheaper, it was no way any particular gamer cared enough about having Kinect to justify getting an Xbox over a PS. The whole direction that Don was going was just not resonating with console gamers and it was a huge miss, even epic. At MS response was what we know it to be, they got rid of Don, put Phil in charge but as we saw, it took years for Phil to even get the bad taste of Kinect and the Xbox one out of most gamers mouth. The number of studios and games were not coming fast enough and all the while Sony was knocking out bangers after Bangers. While I do agree that software drives hardware, having bad and costly hardware can kill any advantage of software. MS cannot replicate how Nintendo work because Nintendo has a history of content and characters not to mention they do not play in the same retail space. MS direct competition is Sony and as the other poster said they share the majority of the same games. Weak hardware is a big key to what most gamers play which is 3rd party content and thus the weak hardware had a significant problem with MS being able to compete for years. |
Exactly these consoles sale mostly cause of third party games. like anyone who does 5 minutes worth of research comparing consoles would see ps4 had a huge advantage spec wise. I also forgot they released xbone 100$ more expensive they literately destroyed their own brand, which was finally gaining traction.
